On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:29:56AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> For what it's worth, this isn't the first complaint I've heard about
>> the spec files we "maintain" in our tree.
>
> That is because Nico keeps bringing it up :)
Actually,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:29:56AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> For what it's worth, this isn't the first complaint I've heard about
>> the spec files we "maintain" in our tree.
>
> That is because Nico keeps bringing it up :)
It's been
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:29:56AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> For what it's worth, this isn't the first complaint I've heard about
> the spec files we "maintain" in our tree.
That is because Nico keeps bringing it up :)
> In our defense, we do
> remove the packages/ directory from the shipped
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> I'm happy to submit these as distinct issues for the issue tracker,
>> but in the short therm, pulling out the unusable rhel-3 and rhel-4
>> packaging would be a good star
On Friday 01 July 2011, Rui Gonçalves wrote:
> Like I said before, I'm currently using the subclise plugin to manage
> all the svn interaction with the repository.
>
> As far as I know, I'm able to select the revisions which I want to
> apply but I'm not sure about the following aspect:
> - on rev
