On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:56:13 +0200, Martin Kutter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 16.08.2011, 11:14 -0400 schrieb Mark Phippard:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Martin Kutter
>> wrote:
>> > is there a way to receive get post-commit error messages on
performing
>> > a
>> > commit with the J
hi,
especially when continuous integration build one option to trigger the
build is if something changed. usually this is easy as the repo
version is increased. is there an easy way to find out if there is a
change considering svn:externals as well?
the only command i was aware of was svn log, bu
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:46:51 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
> > Actually I think these are better handled by throwing away the merge
> > results and doing the renames/removes on the respective branches, then
> > redo the merge.
>
> The above is only for "add vs. add" situations.
> Scenarios inv
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:51, Joel Hughes wrote:
>
>
There is at least one known glitchy release of SlikSvn out there.
A crash dump is almost useless if there's no description of what you
were doing to make it happen. You can't just dump a logfile off to a
mailing list and expect something to b
Hi,
Which circumstances can cause "svn upgrade" in SVN 1.7 to fail with the
following message:
svn: E200030: database table is locked: NODES
Thanks,
Best regards
Markus Schaber
___
We software Automation.
3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Mem
On 18-Aug-11 21:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Indeed, multiple copyfroms would be nasty.
But I don't see the need.
I definitely don't need it, I just saw a use in having it.
My idea that you should be able to choose the source was based on a wrong
assumption. Now I realize merges are always asy
Anyone? Really? No one knows anything about this?
- Dennis
"Dennis Jones" wrote in message
news:j1shsm$lbu$1...@dough.gmane.org...
> Hi,
>
> I used rsvndump to dump a remote repository (because the server is running
> an old version of SVN from before support for 'replay' was added). Now I
Please reply to all to keep discussion on the mailing list.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:48, Joel Hughes wrote:
> Hey, I'm just following the directions provided when it happened. I thought
> it was pretty useless as well. Perhaps instead you should provide a url
> which further explains all the d
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Andy Levy wrote:
> Please reply to all to keep discussion on the mailing list.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:48, Joel Hughes
> wrote:
> > Hey, I'm just following the directions provided when it happened. I
> thought
> > it was pretty useless as well. Perhaps i
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:51:40 +, Stein Somers wrote:
> Now I realize merges are always asymmetric.
Actually, merging is a symmetric operation. The tree (and copyfrom
info) resulting from a merge should be the same independent of in
which direction the merge is performed. In svn the metadata ju
2011/8/19 Dennis Jones :
> Anyone? Really? No one knows anything about this?
>
> - Dennis
>
> "Dennis Jones" wrote in message
> news:j1shsm$lbu$1...@dough.gmane.org...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used rsvndump to dump a remote repository (because the server is running
>> an old version of SVN from before sup
2011/8/19 rupert.thurner :
> hi,
>
> especially when continuous integration build one option to trigger the
> build is if something changed. usually this is easy as the repo
> version is increased. is there an easy way to find out if there is a
> change considering svn:externals as well?
>
> the on
"Konstantin Kolinko" wrote in message
news:cabzhfvmz1acxa5vp2sbkctyezr8t3ih1xi2ogtsebyay3df...@mail.gmail.com...
>> I used rsvndump
> What is that? You mean you performed the dump remotely using svnrdump
> utility from some beta of svn 1.7 ? Does it work without replay
> support on the server
On 8/19/2011 11:20 AM, Dennis Jones wrote:
I would suggest to compare what actually is in that revision in the
old and new repository. Do they match, or anything differs?
There is no new repository. I am trying to create a new, clean repository
from the old server (of which I only have remo
On Aug 19, 2011, at 18:45 , Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/19/2011 11:20 AM, Dennis Jones wrote:
>
>>
>>> I would suggest to compare what actually is in that revision in the
>>> old and new repository. Do they match, or anything differs?
>>
>> There is no new repository. I am trying to create a n
"Stephen Butler" wrote in message
news:e19fc591-322d-4775-8d5f-9bea8b791...@elego.de...
>On Aug 19, 2011, at 18:45 , Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On 8/19/2011 11:20 AM, Dennis Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
I would suggest to compare what actually is in that revision in the
old and new repository. D
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:27, Seth Daniel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I upgraded from 1.6.9 to 1.6.17. 'svn up' is very noticeably
> slower than it used to be. I didn't see anything in the CHANGES file
> about signficant 'update' changes so I was wondering if this was expected?
>
> With 1.6.9
The following is a bug report for triage and review. I've been unable to
locate an adequate fix or discussion for this issue; however, I have
found an acceptable workaround.
When built on OSX, SVN versions 1.6.16 (r1073529) and 1.6.17 (r1128011)
appear to handle authentication challenges on c
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:10:46AM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:27, Seth Daniel
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently I upgraded from 1.6.9 to 1.6.17. 'svn up' is very noticeably
> > slower than it used to be. I didn't see anything in the CHANGES file
> > about signfican
"Dennis Jones" wrote in message
news:j2m6a0$763$1...@dough.gmane.org...
>
> "Stephen Butler" wrote in message
> news:e19fc591-322d-4775-8d5f-9bea8b791...@elego.de...
>
>>On Aug 19, 2011, at 18:45 , Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/19/2011 11:20 AM, Dennis Jones wrote:
>>>
> I would sug
20 matches
Mail list logo
