On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Victor Medina
jefedesopo...@cmgm.com.ve wrote:
Hi all!
About compiling Subverions with BDB support,
Which is the best BDB version to compile Subversion 1.6 1.7? Can I
use the latest? Or there are specific recomended versions for 1.6 and
1.7? I'm building
[ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. please put your reply
below or inline. More below ... ]
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kyle Leber kyle.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 20:47:29 +0200:
[ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. please put your reply
below or inline. More below ... ]
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kyle Leber kyle.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn
Thanks, Johan. I tested with 1.7rc4 and it did not make any perceptible
difference. Anything else I can try?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber kyle.le...@gmail.com wrote:
I've encountered what I think is a
Hi,
there is a bit more than just inffast.obj
Without the patch I build it this way (x86):
--- snip ---
C:\python27\python gen-make.py -t vcproj --vsnet-version=2008
--with-httpd=C:\build\httpd-2.2.19-sni6-x86
--with-openssl=C:\build\httpd-2.2.19-sni6-x86\srclib\openssl
After committing changes to the repository on the dev machine, could I
use svn update instead of rsync to bring the production machine's
files in sync with those on the dev machine?
Yes, and even better if you have an intermediate staging/testing
space, but that may be overkill for some
What method of profiling do you recommend? I have used gprof previously
(it's been awhile) but am not familiar with the subversion project source
code and build setup. Is the a online guide or wiki describing the
preferred setup for performing this?
Kyle
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel
On Oct 1, 2011, at 18:15, Grant wrote:
Would I need to install subversion on the production machine, or would
the subversion server running on the dev machine just treat the
production machine as a target destination and use SSH to transfer the
files?
So I'll be OK if I commit changes to
gprof is what I'm familiar with (nutshell: compile with 'gcc -pg' and
read gmon.out). There are no specific profiling docs for svn; if you
need more specific advice please post to the dev@ list. Thanks!
Kyle Leber wrote on Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 19:33:10 -0400:
What method of profiling do you
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Would I need to install subversion on the production machine, or would
the subversion server running on the dev machine just treat the
production machine as a target destination and use SSH to transfer the
files?
How you move
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andy Levy andy.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:01, Trevor Schaffer
trevorschaf...@smarttech.com wrote:
We definitely use svn copy for revisions, but I think the issue is because
our tags are too flat vs not flat enough.
E.g. tags/builds/ is
Again I strongly encourage you to spend time reading the book. The first
several chapters should solidify for you how people work with Subversion.
There's no sense in us explaining it all here on the list when writers have
already spent years refining the words in the book. But I'll try to
On Oct 1, 2011, at 20:07, Grant wrote:
There is a repository -- a database -- that holds your code. The current
version and all past versions, including, if you like, branches. This could
be on any server you like -- the production server, the development server,
a completely separate
On 10/1/2011 6:07 PM, Grant wrote:
Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will
need a full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read
access to one or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based
authz. Instead, could I check out a working copy of the
Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will need a
full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read access to one
or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based authz. Instead, could
I check out a working copy of the repository to a staging machine of
On 10/1/2011 8:26 PM, Grant wrote:
Ouch. If testing is done on the developer's local machine, he will need a
full working copy and it will be impossible to restrict read access to one
or a few files as I had planned to do with path-based authz. Instead, could
I check out a working copy of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
