Re: Keep separate checkouts up to date

2012-02-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:07 PM, John Leonard wrote: > first, commit each one then update each one? >>> >>> >>> Yes, normally these events are not strictly synchronized. Commit when >> you >> are sure a set of changes are in a state you want to save, and update when >> you are ready to pick up

Re: Keep separate checkouts up to date

2012-02-19 Thread John Leonard
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:12:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:34 PM, John Leonard wrote: What is a good way to keep multiple checkouts up to date? Would it be to first, commit each one then update each one? Yes, normally these events are not strictly synchronized.

Re: Keep separate checkouts up to date

2012-02-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:34 PM, John Leonard wrote: > What is a good way to keep multiple checkouts up to date? Would it be to > first, commit each one then update each one? > > Yes, normally these events are not strictly synchronized. Commit when you are sure a set of changes are in a state y

Keep separate checkouts up to date

2012-02-19 Thread John Leonard
What is a good way to keep multiple checkouts up to date? Would it be to first, commit each one then update each one? John L. -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Re: SVN backup with lvm snapshots and rsync

2012-02-19 Thread Blair Zajac
On 02/15/2012 11:05 AM, Philip Martin wrote: Stefan Sperling writes: But rather than going through that effort, I would recommend using svnadmin dump/load, or svnsync with file:// URLs, until Subversion 1.8 is released. At which point you can switch over to using "svnadmin hotcopy --incrementa

RE: Branching/Merging Strategy

2012-02-19 Thread
> From: leojhartiv [mailto:leo.h...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 8:36 AM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Branching/Merging Strategy > > I wanted to describe our branching and merging strategy and hopefully get > some feedback. We are using Subversion Server 1.6. >

Re: Cannot view log while working copy is locked

2012-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
All true, but it would still have been nice for André's use case to work. 'svn log' needs almost zero information from the wc, after all... Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:32:46 +0100: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 03:25:52AM +0100, André Hänsel wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > recently

RE: ran get-location-segments.py returns 0

2012-02-19 Thread Rokhkin, IlyaX
OK, now I understand Need to run #get-location-segments.py /repo/path/to/filename And then it says example if the file foo has 3 other instances in history that were replaced (R) So get-location-segments.py works per file and not per repo, right? Regards, Ilya Rokhkin Configuration Management Eng

Re: ran get-location-segments.py returns 0

2012-02-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:44:55PM +, Rokhkin, IlyaX wrote: > Yes, it helps > But the issue more complicated > We have hundred such files in the repo, and we do not know the names, we want > to find all those files that were replaced (R) Well, if you run 'svn log' on the repository root it wi

RE: ran get-location-segments.py returns 0

2012-02-19 Thread Rokhkin, IlyaX
Yes, it helps But the issue more complicated We have hundred such files in the repo, and we do not know the names, we want to find all those files that were replaced (R) In collabnet they said me that get-location-segments.py can find all such files in the repo Regards, Ilya Rokhkin Configuratio

Re: ran get-location-segments.py returns 0

2012-02-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 08:37:24AM +, Rokhkin, IlyaX wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Files were replaced (R) by merge, because they have 2 different ID, so one > file with its history is deleted > The idea is to find those deleted file with history If I replace a file called 'alpha' and commit the r

Re: Cannot view log while working copy is locked

2012-02-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 03:25:52AM +0100, André Hänsel wrote: > Hi list, > > recently I noticed that I cannot view the log while an update of a working > copy is running. It's quite annoying. I wonder if it has always been this > way or if this is new in 1.7. This is new in 1.7. It happens becaus

RE: ran get-location-segments.py returns 0

2012-02-19 Thread Rokhkin, IlyaX
Hi Stefan, Files were replaced (R) by merge, because they have 2 different ID, so one file with its history is deleted The idea is to find those deleted file with history Regards, Ilya Rokhkin Configuration Management Engineer Intel - Data, storage and SW Team iNET: 8-920-6165 Tel: +972-3-929616