going to check all of this will update soon
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:49:58 -0500:
On May 7, 2012, at 11:18, Moty wrote:
I want to make svn history smaller. I have 55000 revisions
and
Am 07.05.2012 18:12, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
Note that you can share pristines between branches today by using a single
working copy for all branches you work on. Check out the repository root
with the --depth empty option and then pull in the branches you need
via update
Hello!
I had an IOerror when updating an external
(different story of an incompatibility between sqlite and our
corporate virus scanner, which is already being worked on
by our Virus department).
Now svn cleanup fails:
D:\PRJ\STM\REF\svn_nbgvo\stp\GSBTG\in\womsvn cleanup
svn: E155016: Missing a
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:29:45AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Am 07.05.2012 18:12, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
Note that you can share pristines between branches today by using a single
working copy for all branches you work on. Check out the repository root
with the --depth empty option
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:54:01AM +0200, Niemann, Hartmut wrote:
svn: E155016: Missing a row in WCROOT.
The working copy meta data is corrupt. It's not easy to fix.
It is possible that just this one row got corrupted, and that it could
be fixed with some sql commands. But even then I would not
Hello list,
I tried coming up with a simple repro-script but there it worked, of
course...
I didn't manage to reproduce the error with the file:// protocol, but
with http:// I was able to reproduce it.
Still on Windows 7, still using subversion 1.7.4 on the client and
subversion 1.4.3 on
Hi,
Mercurial has a very convenient command hg incoming which is
basically what's new for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add
the same capability to Subversion? `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok,
but not everybody proficient enough to know about it.
Please, CC.
--
anatoly t.
On 08/05/12 15:33, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hi,
Mercurial has a very convenient command hg incoming which is
basically what's new for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add
the same capability to Subversion? `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok,
but not everybody proficient enough to know about
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hi,
Mercurial has a very convenient command hg incoming which is
basically what's new for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add
the same capability to Subversion? `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok,
but not everybody
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hi,
Mercurial has a very convenient command hg incoming which is
basically what's new for incoming changes. Will it be nice to add
the same capability to
Mercurial has a very convenient command hg incoming which is
For clarification what hg incoming means:
hg incoming shows the changesets that are new on the server
and that will come if the user says hg pull...
The equivalent command for subversion would be a preview what
changes svn
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:55 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hi,
Mercurial has a very convenient command hg incoming which is
basically
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Andy Levy andy.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:55 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:33:15PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:12:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
As I said `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, but not everybody
proficient enough to know about it.
I'm not convinced that we need another subcommand for this.
If users have trouble discovering this functionality, what about
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:12:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
As I said `svn log -r BASE:HEAD' works ok, but not everybody
proficient enough to know about it.
I'm not convinced that we need another subcommand for this.
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:48:56 +0200:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 20:20:27 +0200:
So 'svn status -u' is a better equivalent to 'hg incoming' than
'svn log -rBASE:HEAD'. But, in most
16 matches
Mail list logo
