On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Jason Heeris wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 08:03, Jason Heeris wrote:
>>
>> I'll file it later today and see what response I get.
>
>
> Apparently I need a buddy with whom to file the bug. If anyone would be
> willing, I'd appreciate it.
>
> I've attached a bash script
On 12 July 2012 17:28, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the
> section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing
> function to make it handle some kind of escape sequence for ']'
> (perhaps ']]'). Would you care to write
[Please try to keep the mails in plain-text]
The problem with using a ‘\’ would be that you break the ‘\’ character in
existing files to fix ‘]’.
Things might be simpler when defining that lines that start with ‘[‘ and end
with ‘]’ should parse everything in between as section markers.
On 12 July 2012 17:45, Bert Huijben wrote:
> [Please try to keep the mails in plain-text]
Oops, my apologies!
> Things might be simpler when defining that lines that start with ‘[‘ and
> end with ‘]’ should parse everything in between as section markers.
> But then, I don’t know how that affect
The issue is filed as #4204:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4204
— Jason
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jason Heeris wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 17:45, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> [Please try to keep the mails in plain-text]
>
> Oops, my apologies!
>
>> Things might be simpler when defining that lines that start with ‘[‘ and
>> end with ‘]’ should parse everything in betwe
Guten Tag Jason Heeris,
am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 um 11:51 schrieben Sie:
> I don't really know *what* constraints there are on honouring existing
> authz file syntax, whether or not it's explicitly specified.
How about just telling svn explicitly which parse mode for section
names one wants?
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:18 +0200:
> I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the
> section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing
Technically, 0x0A (newline) would likely be a problem too. Not sure
that anyone uses it...
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:06:07 +0200:
> I think ']]' would be the best choice, but still not 100% backwards
> compatible. But I mean, who in their right mind would write sections
> like this:
>
> [repo:/path/to/file.ext]]haha, this isn't parsed
We document the format as "i
Bob, can you email users-l...@subversion.apache.org please and grep the
output for "deshaw" ?
Bob Archer wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:13:34 -0400:
> If you send me the full email that is causing the bounce I can unsubscribe
> it. I haven't seen the bounces.
>
> BOb
>
>
> > -Original Me
Thorsten Schöning wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 18:03:49 +0200:
> Guten Tag Matthew Pounsett,
> am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2012 um 17:30 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I'm sure others have seen this too, but any time I post to the list
> > I'm getting a bounce from world.deshaw.com. Could an admin track
> > dow
Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 um 14:14 schrieben Sie:
> I am postmaster, and I didn't receive your message.
I meant the postmaster of the former company of the user responsible
for the bounce.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Thorsten Schöning E-Mail
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: KARR, DAVID [mailto:dk0...@att.com]
>> Sent: 12 July 2012 00:39
>> To: users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see older
>> merge history on elements merged from bran
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:18 +0200:
>> I think the only character that causes problems is ']' (which ends the
>> section name parsing). It seems not too hard to change that parsing
>
> Technically, 0x0A (newline) wou
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 16:45:36 +0200:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:06:07 +0200:
> >> I think ']]' would be the best choice, but still not 100% backwards
> >> compatible. But I mean, who in th
> -Original Message-
> From: Cooke, Mark [mailto:mark.co...@siemens.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:00 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: KARR, DAVID
> Subject: RE: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see older merge
> history on elements merged from branch to trunk?
>
Hi all,
Dumb question here, but let's say I'm doing a weekly full backup with
svnadmin hotcopy, and a daily backup using svnsync to a mirror.
Now let's say my main repository goes down. I can restore the full
backup from a week ago, but then how do I "replay" the extra revisions
from the mirror
> -Original Message-
> From: KARR, DAVID
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:39 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see older merge
> history on elements merged from branch to trunk?
>
> It appears that our SVN on our server was recently
Thorsten Schöning wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 14:18:58 +0200:
> Guten Tag Daniel Shahaf,
> am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 um 14:14 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I am postmaster, and I didn't receive your message.
>
> I meant the postmaster of the former company of the user responsible
> for the bounce.
A
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
>
> Now let's say my main repository goes down. I can restore the full
> backup from a week ago, but then how do I "replay" the extra revisions
> from the mirror into it?
>
> Is svnadmin dump and svnadmin load what I'm looking for?
Ok, ba
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively, is there a way to "transform" a read-only mirror into a
>> normal repository? (I don't plan on doing this; it's just more for
>> curiosity.)
>
> I'm still curious about this one, but if no one knows it's not a big dea
Hello,
I've administered low volume svn repositories for approx. 7 years, and I'd like
to add my woes to those of other 'tree conflict' victims.
I have a small repo, to which I am the only one committing.
On one machine, I created a directory of source in the repo, but did not add it
to the r
On 12 July 2012 17:51, Jason Heeris wrote:
> I don't really know *what* constraints there are on honouring existing
> authz file syntax, whether or not it's explicitly specified.
Thorsten Schöning said: "How about just telling svn explicitly which
parse mode for section names one wants?"
I'd sug
> -Original Message-
> From: KARR, DAVID [mailto:dk0...@att.com]
> Sent: 12 July 2012 17:34
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: If our SVN server is 1.6.12, why don't I see
> older merge history on elements merged from branch to trunk?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Fr
24 matches
Mail list logo
