On 27.05.2013 16:12, Tobias Bading wrote:
On 27.05.2013 16:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
Can you try this: run the following command for a couple of seconds, it
should give you an idea about the system clock precision.
{ while true; do date '+%M:%S.%N'; done; } | uniq
Redirected to a file, I get
Hello list,
We're starting to create slave Subversion repos for installation on
remote sites. All of them will svnsync against a single central master
at headquarters.
Now the question: we would like all users on the remote sites to
authenticate against the master (to avoid having replicating
Tobias Bading tbad...@web.de writes:
On 27.05.2013 16:12, Tobias Bading wrote:
On 27.05.2013 16:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
Can you try this: run the following command for a couple of seconds, it
should give you an idea about the system clock precision.
{ while true; do date '+%M:%S.%N'; done;
Hi,
I have subversion 1.6.11 installed on redhat 64bit server used since
long. Seems to be installed using rpm/yum not from source.
Can you suggest me how i get svn python binding for existing setup without
effective my current environment? everyone says of compiling from source,
which i am
From: kapila narang [mailto:kapilanar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 May 2013 12:08
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Get subversion python bindings on existing subversion setup
Hi,
I have subversion 1.6.11 installed on redhat 64bit server used since long.
On 28.05.2013 12:54, Philip Martin wrote:
Tobias Bading tbad...@web.de writes:
On 27.05.2013 16:12, Tobias Bading wrote:
On 27.05.2013 16:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
Can you try this: run the following command for a couple of seconds, it
should give you an idea about the system clock precision.
On 28.05.2013 14:31, Philip Martin wrote:
Tobias Badingtbad...@web.de writes:
b) '{ while true; do echo t; ls -l --full-time t; rm t; done; } |
uniq' prints exactly *two* lines per second, one every 0.5 seconds,
exact down to the millisecond.
I have an Ubuntu 12.04 machine and I see the
Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com writes:
What we /should/ do is create a tempfile and keep changing and stat'ing
it until its mtime changes. We could do this with an exponential backoff
sleep, too. Then there would be no guesswork about the timestamp
resolution of the WC file system.
The
Tobias Bading tbad...@web.de writes:
Did you run the tests on Ubuntu 10.04 on an ext3 or ext4 filesystem?
On ext3 you might not encounter this problem because ext3 only has a
timestamp resolution of a second, thus you don't enter the
if(finfo.mtime % APR_USEC_PER_SEC) block in
On 28.05.2013 15:15, Philip Martin wrote:
Are you running some non-standard kernel?
Depends on your definition of 'standard'. ;-)
I'm using the default kernel linux-image-2.6.32-46-generic from the
Ubuntu Lucid repositories.
Hi everyone,
I'd like to point readers following Subversion development to the Hackathon
announcement on our website: http://subversion.apache.org/#news-20130628
Hackathons provide an opportunity for the Subversion development community
to meet in person and work together in the same location.
Philippe Andersson wrote on Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:52:10 +0200:
Hello list,
We're starting to create slave Subversion repos for installation on
remote sites. All of them will svnsync against a single central master
at headquarters.
Now the question: we would like all users on the remote
12 matches
Mail list logo
