Re: [SVN Users] SVN Status Command Line in 1.8 vs 1.7

2014-03-07 Thread Forest Handford
Thank you Bert! On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > The relevant change was in revision r1428637 > > > > [[ > > > > r1428637 | julianfoad | 2013-01-03 23:13:26 +0100 (do, 03 jan 2013) | 7 > lines > > > >

Re: .svn directory - safe to add files in ".svn" or ".svn/tmp"?

2014-03-07 Thread jrm
On 03/06/2014 08:48 PM, Andy Levy wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:44 PM, jrm wrote: Working on some tools for a development environment that will make use of SVN. There are circumstances where I want to create temporary information of my own, related to checked out versions. Rather than clut

Re: .svn directory - safe to add files in ".svn" or ".svn/tmp"?

2014-03-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.03.2014 17:24, jrm wrote: > > On 03/06/2014 08:48 PM, Andy Levy wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:44 PM, jrm wrote: >>> Working on some tools for a development environment that will make >>> use of >>> SVN. There are circumstances where I want to create temporary >>> information >>> of my

Re: .svn directory - safe to add files in ".svn" or ".svn/tmp"?

2014-03-07 Thread Ben Reser
On 3/7/14, 8:24 AM, jrm wrote: >> Do not do anything in the .svn directory. That directory is >> exclusively for the use of the SVN working copy library and you could >> easily break your WC. > > Sure - if I overwrote something that has a genuine purpose - or created > something in a location wher

Re: .svn directory - safe to add files in ".svn" or ".svn/tmp"?

2014-03-07 Thread Philip Martin
Branko Čibej writes: > No-one can stop you from messing with .svn/, but if you do, please don't > report here when something breaks. Running 'svn cleanup' removes everything in .svn/tmp. Upgrading from 1.6 to 1.7 removes the entire .svn directory from every directory except the working copy roo

Re: [SVN Users] SVN Status Command Line in 1.8 vs 1.7

2014-03-07 Thread Adam Contardo
Sweet, thanks Bert. This will certainly save us a substantial amount of time and energy. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Forest Handford wrote: > Thank you Bert! > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> The relevant change was in revision r1428637 >> >> >> >> [[ >> >> ---

[BUG][All versions][svn merge --reintegrate] doesn't work on ra_svn

2014-03-07 Thread ca5coder
Hello, all! The bug was detected first time on: -- dev: {501} svn --version svn, version 1.5.2 (r32768) compiled Oct 10 2012, 09:39:49 Copyright (C) 2000-2008 CollabNet. Subversion is open source software, see http://subversion.tigris.org

tigris.org down?

2014-03-07 Thread Kyle Sluder
Trying to access the issue tracker, but subversion.tigris.org is dropping connections.

Re: tigris.org down?

2014-03-07 Thread Ben Reser
On 3/7/14, 2:46 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > Trying to access the issue tracker, but subversion.tigris.org is > dropping connections. It's working for me now.

Re: tigris.org down?

2014-03-07 Thread Kyle Sluder
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 03:01 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > On 3/7/14, 2:46 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > > Trying to access the issue tracker, but subversion.tigris.org is > > dropping connections. > > It's working for me now. > Me too. Thanks, all. I'll keep quiet if it hiccups again ;-) --Kyle Sluder

Re: .svn directory - safe to add files in ".svn" or ".svn/tmp"?

2014-03-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:24 AM, jrm wrote: > Sure - if I overwrote something that has a genuine purpose - or created > something in a location where SVN expects exactly certain files to be. > But is SVN so fragile that it can't tolerate a differently named > subdirectory > or file under there?