Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 29.04.2015 05:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: >> Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format >> lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such >> an old repo, all of which fail

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 28.04.2015 23:03, Andrew Reedick wrote: > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format > lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such > an old repo, all of which fail with "svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file > 'devel\db\current':

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format > lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such > an old repo, all of which fail with "svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file > 'devel\

Re: Best version for RHEL7/CentOS 7?

2015-04-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Can someone comment on the best version of subversion to run on >> CentOS7? The distribution supplies 1.7.14.I was thinking of >> using the packaged 1.8.x from Wandisco, but I

RE: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Andrew Reedick
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:jreed...@incomm.com] > > > > On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The > > > db/format lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnad

RE: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Andrew Reedick
> -Original Message- > From: Joseph Bruni [mailto:jbr...@icloud.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:09 PM > To: Andrew Reedick > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1) > > > On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: > > >

RE: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:jreed...@incomm.com] > Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2015 23:03 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1) > > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format > lists

Re: Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Joseph Bruni
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Andrew Reedick wrote: > > Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format > lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such > an old repo, all of which fail with "svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file > 'devel

Re: Best version for RHEL7/CentOS 7?

2015-04-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Can someone comment on the best version of subversion to run on > CentOS7? The distribution supplies 1.7.14.I was thinking of > using the packaged 1.8.x from Wandisco, but I don't see a mod_dav_svn > here: > http://opensource.wandisco.co

Dealing with very old repo format (version 1)

2015-04-28 Thread Andrew Reedick
Does anyone have any tips on how to upgrade a very old repo? The db/format lists "1". A 1.8 svn client cannot hotcopy, dump or "svnadmin upgrade" such an old repo, all of which fail with "svnadmin: E720002: Can't open file 'devel\db\current': The system cannot find the file specified." Do I n

Best version for RHEL7/CentOS 7?

2015-04-28 Thread Les Mikesell
Can someone comment on the best version of subversion to run on CentOS7? The distribution supplies 1.7.14.I was thinking of using the packaged 1.8.x from Wandisco, but I don't see a mod_dav_svn here: http://opensource.wandisco.com/centos/7/svn-1.8/RPMS/x86_64/ Does that mean there is a proble

svn diff produces invalid XML if path contains bell character

2015-04-28 Thread Brian Preuß
Hi there, it seems that svn diff produces invalid XML if a path contains a bell characters. Since this character is not allowed in XML it should be escaped. It seems that svn diff does not to this. Is there an existing bug for this problem? Regards, Brian Preuß

Re: Cannot checkout or clean up using 1.9 dev build

2015-04-28 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 28 April 2015 at 16:15, Benjamin Fritz wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2015 8:02 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote: >> >> >> I've fixed at least one problem in svn_stream__install*() on Windows >> with long path names in r1676526. >> >> But I was getting different error message on Windows 8.1. Benjamin, >> what o

Re: Cannot checkout or clean up using 1.9 dev build

2015-04-28 Thread Benjamin Fritz
On Apr 28, 2015 8:02 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote: > > > I've fixed at least one problem in svn_stream__install*() on Windows > with long path names in r1676526. > > But I was getting different error message on Windows 8.1. Benjamin, > what operating system do you use? > Windows 7

Re: Cannot checkout or clean up using 1.9 dev build

2015-04-28 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 28 April 2015 at 10:07, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 27 April 2015 at 21:35, Benjamin Fritz wrote: >> Apparently I'm not subscribed to get list emails; please CC me on future >> responses. I had to get this message from the archive :-) >> >> Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 27.04.2015 18:06, Benjamin Fri

Re: Cannot checkout or clean up using 1.9 dev build

2015-04-28 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 27 April 2015 at 21:35, Benjamin Fritz wrote: > Apparently I'm not subscribed to get list emails; please CC me on future > responses. I had to get this message from the archive :-) > > Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 27.04.2015 18:06, Benjamin Fritz wrote: >> > I get the following error when I try to