On 22.07.2015 15:51, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>> Sent: woensdag 22 juli 2015 13:43
>> To: Markus Schaber
>> Cc: Grierson, David ; d...@subversion.apache.org; 牛
>> 暁冬 ; users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Fea
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 22.07.2015 02:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Andreas Stieger
>> wrote:
>>
Even if you have two repositories that are identical to each other, one of
them will need to be designated the "master"
Stefan Hett writes:
> Looks like the dumps are from a VisualSVN Server compiled version. Did you
> try contacting their support? Without the PDBs from their compiled version
> it's a bit difficult for other users like me to check the crash out...
Here is a proper stacktrace of the crash, reassem
Looks like the dumps are from a VisualSVN Server compiled version. Did
you try contacting their support? Without the PDBs from their compiled
version it's a bit difficult for other users like me to check the crash
out...
Kind Regards,
Simon Rowe
Senior Manager Engineering
Siemens plc
Health
Kind Regards,
Simon Rowe
Senior Manager Engineering
Siemens plc
Healthcare Sector
Molecular Imaging/MR Magnet Technology
Beaver House
23/38 Hythe Bridge Street
OXFORD OX1 2EP
United Kingdom
Direct Line +44 (0)1865 265566
Fax +44 (0)1865 265501
Mobile +44 (0) 7921243214
E-Mail simon.r...@siemens
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: woensdag 22 juli 2015 13:43
> To: Markus Schaber
> Cc: Grierson, David ; d...@subversion.apache.org; 牛
> 暁冬 ; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
On 21 July 2015 at 11:38, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> David Grierson wrote:
>> > "svn revert" will delete the local changes and nowhere to find, which
>> > is dangerous.
>> > I suggest the default behaiver should be save the local changed
>> > file(if any) to "filename.local" and do the re
Markus Schaber wrote on Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 13:01:09 +:
> All other commands need a --force or other explicit user decision to
> override user changed data, but the whole purpose of the "svn revert"
> command is to undo local changes - putting a --force option or
> something similar seems lik
On 22.07.2015 02:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Andreas Stieger
> wrote:
>
>>> Even if you have two repositories that are identical to each other, one of
>>> them will need to be designated the "master", and that will be the one that
>>> all commits are made to.
"Nico Kadel-Garcia" wrote:
> > Best approach in the svn space for Mani would be vendor branches based on
> > the information shared.
>
> Or investing in a genuine multi-master version of Subversion, which
> Wandisco sells. Simply spending some money instead of investing in
> hours of hacking and
10 matches
Mail list logo
