On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:33 PM, wrote:
> Yes, these externals are deliberately pegged and I have other working
> copies(WC) based on the exact same checkout and they show up as a single and
> not a mixed revision WC.
>
> Of the 108 WCs I've looked at, 36 are in a mixed-revision configuration and
Yes, these externals are deliberately pegged and I have other working
copies(WC) based on the exact same checkout and they show up as a single and
not a mixed revision WC.
Of the 108 WCs I've looked at, 36 are in a mixed-revision configuration and
that's OK but in several cases, these WCs cannot
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On 08/17/2016 04:36 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Adam Jensen wrote:
> [snip]
> >> So basically, the checkout method will require twice (2x) the data-set
> >> size of storage space for a working copy but ther
Hi,
While I fully agree with Stefan, I would like to mention that we use svn in a
non-standard way. We think still with very good performance and use case
coverage. It is not for source code. It is technical sales project management.
Sharing all kind of doks jpegs,mp3,mp4,pdf,word,... We succes
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:09:27PM -0400, Adam Jensen wrote:
> What I need (and what I think is generally needed) is a high-capacity,
> large-file repository with a focus on data integrity (mandatory audit
> trails), sophisticated access control (smart contracts (maybe blockchain
> based)), probabl
