Re: svn vs. git

2017-07-22 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Jul 22, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I can glance at it if I can find some cycles, no promises. I'm leery: > much of Subversion's support that I've seen, and that I've sold > Subversion migration work with myself, is that the singular repository > can be used to force develope

Re: svn vs. git

2017-07-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Yeah, well, we know the lack of 'obliterate' is one of your favourite > complaints about svn. I am not bothered by it at all, and so are many other > svn users. But okay. > > You do realise git repositories get cloned, right? So once your

Re: svn vs. git

2017-07-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:45:05AM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, Stefan, > > Thanks for your feedback! Please see my response inline. > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:01:55PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > > The FreeBSD repository is one of the bes

Re: svn vs. git

2017-07-22 Thread Paul Hammant
> > > > As Branko already said, work is being done for this, as we speak. So if > you're interested and want to share your ideas about how this should work > in Subversion, hop over to dev@ and give your thoughts. There are some > google docs written by Julian Foad with design ideas, UI proposal et

Re: svn vs. git

2017-07-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Op 22 jul. 2017 03:00 schreef "Nico Kadel-Garcia" : On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> Not wanting to start a flame war, but for all svn users and admins out >> there that sometimes need to have this conversation