On 18.12.2017 08:16, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 01:22:06 +, Branko ??ibej wrote:
> ...
>> The /path/ of the file implies which branch or tag it belongs to. There
>> is no other information you need.
> Oh yes, there is. Knowing which files are included in the tag
> is fine (and a
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 01:22:06 +, Branko ??ibej wrote:
...
> The /path/ of the file implies which branch or tag it belongs to. There
> is no other information you need.
Oh yes, there is. Knowing which files are included in the tag
is fine (and a very basic property), but I'd also like to be
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:35:29 +, Bo Berglund wrote:
...
> I have a hard time getting to understand this...
> Do you mean that using "trunk", "branches" and "tags" as directories
> is entirely voluntary?
Exactly.
> Does this also mean that files inside a
> tags/something directory can be
On Dec 17, 2017, at 6:35 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 01:22:06 +0100, Branko ?ibej
> wrote:
>
>> We'll have to dispel some misconceptions. Subversion's data model is
>> significantly different from CVS's. Tags (and branches) are not
>>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 01:22:06 +0100, Branko ?ibej
wrote:
>We'll have to dispel some misconceptions. Subversion's data model is
>significantly different from CVS's. Tags (and branches) are not
>properties of files, they're just (sub)trees within the repository.
>Creating a tag or