On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:23 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
> wrote:
>
>> fp = builtins.open(file, 'w+') # avoid namespace clash with
>># trimmed-down svn_fs_open()
>
>
> I'm now thinking the probl
--On Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:23 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
wrote:
fp = builtins.open(file, 'w+') # avoid namespace clash with
# trimmed-down svn_fs_open()
I'm now thinking the problem is in the open call, and that I'm somehow
getting a Python 3 open
--On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 7:14 AM -0800 Kenneth Porter
wrote:
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/svn/fs.py", line 87, in
_dump_contents
fp.write(chunk)
TypeError: must be unicode, not str
Here's the code where this is going wrong. I think svn_stream_read is
returning a by
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:58 +0100:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:45:07AM -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > The get-deps.sh script that comes with the source tarball is fetching
> > apr-1.4.6 and apr-util-1.5.1. There are newer versions available,
> > namely apr-1.6.3 and apr-util-
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:45:07AM -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to update a Subversion server from 1.8.11 to 1.8.19.
>
> I'm building from the source tarball in order to run the test suites
> of svn and its dependencies.
>
> The get-deps.sh script that comes with the s
Hi all,
I'm planning to update a Subversion server from 1.8.11 to 1.8.19.
I'm building from the source tarball in order to run the test suites
of svn and its dependencies.
The get-deps.sh script that comes with the source tarball is fetching
apr-1.4.6 and apr-util-1.5.1. There are newer versions
Hi Johan,
As you suggested I have removed the leading spaces from line 39
(enable-rep-sharing=false) and this time it worked and was able to successfully
load the problematic revision.
So does this conclude I have the sha-1 colliding files in my repo ? Also what
are the next steps to catchup th
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Santosh Kondapuram
> wrote:
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> Sorry for the delayed response as I was in long vacation.
>> Yes, I don’t think we are hitting the real sha-1 collision in our repository
>> and as you said i
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Santosh Kondapuram
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response as I was in long vacation.
> Yes, I don’t think we are hitting the real sha-1 collision in our repository
> and as you said it might be another bug in the sha-1 collision detection code.
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 29 januari 2018 13:54
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Searching for a C++ API
>
> On 29.01.2018 11:45, R developer wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have been involved in writing a closed s
Hi Johan,
Sorry for the delayed response as I was in long vacation.
Yes, I don’t think we are hitting the real sha-1 collision in our repository
and as you said it might be another bug in the sha-1 collision detection code.
I am sure that no one committed the sha-1-colliding files from
https://
11 matches
Mail list logo