Christophe Royer wrote on Sat, 14 May 2022 23:28 +00:00:
> Thank you for looking into this, taking the time to clean up the script
> and share your comments. Lessons learnt.
>
> I will likely revert (maybe manually) those invalid mergeinfo.
>
Sure. I recommend that you use a record-only reverse
Thank you for looking into this, taking the time to clean up the script
and share your comments. Lessons learnt.
I will likely revert (maybe manually) those invalid mergeinfo.
Still not quite sure of the consequences, and if this situation could be
detected. Maybe a defect or enhancement
Christophe Royer wrote on Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:45:14 -0700:
> Daniel, the first script I sent may confuse things a little, because of the
> tree conflict.
> Here is another script that avoid that issue. The problem is the same: it
> looks like the mergeinfo does not match the state of the
