If that information ( Lack of explicit anon-access is interpreted as
anon-access=read) was in the svnserv.conf file, it would have saved me a few
hours of troubleshooting.
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bill Cebula wrote on Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 18:30
r bug.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Bill Cebula writes:
>
> > I would expect the same behavior whether the* anon-access* line is
> > commented or whether it is specified as *none*. However, if the
> > anon-access line is commented,
