Client error when doing server side proplist

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
et this for a few files. Running 'svnadmin verify' on the repository does not indicate anything wrong. Please advice. Regards /Daniel Widenfalk

Re: Client error when doing server side proplist

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
des software developed by CollabNet (http://www.Collab.Net/). Regards /Daniel Widenfalk P.s. Sorry for top posting. On 2010-12-10 12:54, Daniel Widenfalk wrote: > Hi all, > > When doing a server side "proplist" I get the following > diagnostic message: > >> svn pl

Re: Client error when doing server side proplist

2010-12-12 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
I think) client using the same server/repo. > All cases to a file that does have properties set. > > Daniel Widenfalk wrote on Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54:03 +0100: >> Hi all, >> >> When doing a server side "proplist" I get the following >> diagnosti

Property change log

2011-02-14 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
:externals . Where proplog is an invented command that only show the log messages for revisions that contain changes to the given property. The command would only recurse if -R is given on the command line. Best regards /Daniel Widenfalk

Potential issue in libsvn_diff:diff_file.c:find_identical_prefix

2012-06-07 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
at the same spot. Rinse and repeat. Are these a known issues? In my case this results in an infinite loop on the following input string: 23 0a 23 20 54 68 69 73 20 70 72 6f 6a 65 63 I found this out when my svn-client spiraled into an infinite loop and would not respond to ctrl-c during a "svn up" command. Regards /Daniel Widenfalk

Re: Potential issue in libsvn_diff:diff_file.c:find_identical_prefix

2012-06-07 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
On 2012-06-07 11:47, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] >> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:34 >> To: 'Daniel Widenfalk'; d...@subversion.apache.org; >> users@subversion

Is this a sign of a broken repository?

2012-11-15 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
- {username} [15/Nov/2012:16:26:47 +0100] "PROPFIND /collection/repository/!svn/vcc/default HTTP/1.1" 207 265 "-" "SVN/1.7.5 neon/0.29.6" {ip-number} - {username} [15/Nov/2012:16:26:47 +0100] "PROPFIND /collection/repository/!svn/bc/1578/project-name/trunk/Filena

Hard-to-understand error message after merge

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
d under svn controll even though we're also moving B -> B\D through updating the externals directive. I would count this as "user error" rather than an "svn error" but it feels weird that I can create a revision that cannot be merged without first doing a svn delete (B) in the destination tree. Thoughts? Side note: This merge also managed to cause TortoiseSVN to crash. Best regards /Daniel Widenfalk

Re: Problem to go to older revision that had externals

2015-01-15 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
up, but after the cleanup I get the same message from the status >> command. If I update now I get an assertion from >> 'subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 1550. > > The failed workqueue happens with trunk as well. I've raised an issue: > http://subversion.tig

Re: Deduce the server URL from the current directory inside the working copy

2017-12-21 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
On 2017-12-21 12:57, Anton Shepelev wrote: > Hello, all > > I find it mildly annoying to type the full path > within a repository for server-side file operations, > such as 'delete' and 'copy'. Observe that, being on > Windows, I must use quotes in order to escape the > caret character: >

Long local absolute path problem on windows (x64).

2010-01-18 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
/testcases. Is this a known (and perhaps even documented) issue with the Subversion client? Do you want some sort of recipe to recreate the problem? Regards /Daniel Widenfalk

Re: Q: Changeset between two revisions

2010-02-05 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
Hi, Manickavel, Senthil wrote: Hi, I would like to create a changeset between > two revisions. I have created a script to do that with > svn commands. But this collects all the files in both > the revisions. Is it possible for me to collect only > the changed file? Script REM Cre

Re: race condition on checkin immediately followed by a merge?

2010-05-18 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
m file time stamp to tick one step and on Windows this means about 2 seconds to be sure. There may be some option that can be specified when committing that forces a deeper check? Regards /Daniel Widenfalk

Re: race condition on checkin immediately followed by a merge?

2010-05-19 Thread Daniel Widenfalk
e-through proxy with replication to read-only mirrors? Re-reading your description it seems that it is step 6 that fails (no new revision to merge). Since both server solutions are multi-threaded it might be that the processing of the commit in step (4) above has not been fully completed (and mirrored?) in time for when you initiate step (6). What kind of timing do you have between the steps? I would guess that 1-2-3-4 and 5-6-7 are fairly fast and that there may be some time N between steps 4 and 5? Regards /Daniel Widenfalk