On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Not wanting to start a flame war, but for all svn users and admins out
>> there that sometimes need to have this conversation ... I found this to be a
>> very nice website:
>>
>>
We have some generated files that, for logistical reasons, are way
easier to just check into the respository alongside the source than to
build on-demand. (They're small text files, not some big binary or
something like that.)
Is there a way to instruct Subversion to remove write access when
check
[I typoed some keys and apparently happened to hit send while still
typing; let's try again. Sorry for the spam.]
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Would this tell you what you need (given a checkout of 'trunk'):
>
> svn diff --summarize ^/trunk@ .
>
> This will give you a
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Would this tell you what you need (given a checkout of 'trunk'):
>
> svn diff --summarize ^/trunk@ .
>
> This will give you a summary of the differences between your current
> working copy state and the tree in the repository at .
Sorry fo
I'd like to put a feature request out there for a --dry-run option to 'svn up'.
There are two things that this would accomplish over 'svn stat --show-updates'.
First, it seems like a natural thing to do; in particular, 'merge'
supports --dry-run and after using Git for a while my mental model of
On 1/27/2012 3:41, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Evan Driscoll wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 15:04:43 -0600:
>> 1. Did removing rep-cache.db fix it, or is there still a potential for
>>some latent repository corruption?
>
> Yes. rep-cache.db is used by the commit proce
aused corruption to
our rep-sharing.dp could, if we upgrade, cause actual problems and
made us restore from backup?
Evan Driscoll
[1] http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#nfs
[2] http://computing.fnal.gov/unixatfermilab/html/afs.html#57212
[3]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbo
