Hi Vincent, Daniel,
The problem is that the "modified" link for branches/1.9.x/ produces a page
with a log of ALL the modifications EVER made in that branch. You're
talking about thousands of log entries from the past couple/three years.
The page simply takes way too long to generate, so the proxy
Thanks for following up on this, Daniel!
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Pavel Lyalyakin wrote on Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:31 +0300:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> > > [...] are you still actively moderating this list?
> > > Do we need more m
I found the patch and moderated it through. Thanks for the patch!!
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 6:09 PM, João M. S. Silva <
joao.m.santos.si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/26/2016 11:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> The instructions say to send a patch to d...@subversion.apache.org, which
>> you say you
The simplest mechanism to avoid large (new) files from getting
committed into your repository is to use the "LimitRequestBody"
directive in your Apache configuration. This is the mechanism that
we use on svn.apache.org
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 09:18:05PM +0200, b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
> H
This is freakin' HOT. Very nice work!
I've reviewed the reports, and it looks like we've maintained all our ABI
guarantees. The changes are what I would expect.
Thank you for this!
Cheers,
-g
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Ponomarenko Andrey <
andrewponomare...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Hello,
>
hen we
can track that down and fix it.
Cheers,
-g
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Edward d'Auvergne
wrote:
> On 3 October 2015 at 01:05, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:06:26AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> >>...
> >> As this b
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:06:26AM +0200, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>...
> As this bad behaviour can be so incredibly damaging for this
> repository,
Note: the files themselves are not "damaged" -- Subversion will never
alter the contents of a file when it is first imported/added. It may
make a fil
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:11:47AM +, Grierson, David wrote:
> > From: wolfgang.zt...@web.de [mailto:wolfgang.zt...@web.de]
> >
> > http://subversion.apache.org/download.cgi#supported-releases:
> > subversion-1.9.1.tar.bz2 2ba78f59b3669e461ef6f56326426918100e2073
> >
> > but sha1sum gives:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 09:41:53AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > ...
> >> I think I've found a workaround: it seems the tree walk by mod_dav is
> >> avoided when the request h
IGNORE. sorry, folks, accidentally moderated it thru :-(
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:35:57AM -0800, Val Pangerl wrote:
> val
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:41:03AM -0400, Andy Levy wrote:
>...
> probably suggested it for git as well. And isn't there a (possibly
> apocryphal) story about the "blame" (either in CVS or SVN) being
> aliased to "annotate" and "praise" because a manager somewhere didn't
> like the negative connota
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Mark Mikofski wrote:
> I was looking for a comprehensive list of SVN clients to link to,
> and I was surprised to see that TortoiseSVN http://tortoisesvn.net/
> is not listed on the packages page
> http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html#windows.
At the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 05:51:22PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> George Schizas writes:
>
> > know if I should also post this to the dev list
>
> Yes, patches to dev please.
No need. I've already patched it: r1497551. We should backport this to
the 1.8.x series.
Thanks, George!
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:57:33PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:32:06PM +0200, Stephen Butler wrote:
> > that's an excellent bug report. Unfortunately, TFS SvnBridge isn't an
> > Apache Subversion server. It emulates the mod_dav_svn protocol,
> > like GitHub do
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 16:24, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:50:32PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>
> Hi greg!
yah yah yah... so some random email client around here threw a message
out. I claim "Not My Fault" :-P
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:56:10PM -0500, Zachary Burnham wrote:
> Hi. I'm having some trouble with command-line svn on OSX 10.7.3 . The
> problem appears to be that subversion can't find the CA certificates that are
> installed on my system (visible in Keychain Access.) I get the following
>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:23, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>> Sent: woensdag 20 juli 2011 1:19
>> To: Gunnar Dalsnes; d...@subversion.apache.org
>> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 1.7 alpha3 bug (asse
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:18, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>...
>> BTW: Someone mentioned using svn 1.7 beta1 and some said it was not
>> released yet. Collabnet disagree as beta1 is listed here:
>> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/frs/do/viewRelease/projects.csvn/frs.svn_binaries.windows
CollabNet should
Bob Archer amsi.com> writes:
>
> Hi Admins..
>
> I am a moderator on this list and a recruiter with the email
> address of [samtechnojobs gmail.com] keeps spamming the list with job
> ads.
>
> Is there any way to add him to a black list or something so
> his email gets bounced?
>
> BOb
Hey
20 matches
Mail list logo
