On 30 Jul 2011, at 18:17, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> '403 forbidden' makes reasonable sense for a client-side message to someone
> who shouldn't know internal details anyway.
Seriously? You think an HTTP response code (which *is* an internal detail) is
an acceptable error message. You think
On 30 Jul 2011, at 20:10, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/30/11 1:14 PM, Jeremy Pereira wrote:
>>
>> On 30 Jul 2011, at 18:17, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> '403 forbidden' makes reasonable sense for a client-side message to someon
On 31 Jul 2011, at 17:46, Rafael Heise wrote:
> In my opinion, as a network administrator, I don't want to show to my end
> users why the user shouldn't commit anything in the repository.
In my opinion as a Subversion user, that sucks. I think I'll switch to
Mercurial. Oh, no wait, the Subve
