response to
OPTIONS request for 'http://svn.example.com/svn/svntest1/Private/Area'
Again, "Forbidden" is "unexpected".
Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anything?
Cheers,
John.
--
John Beranek, Senior Software Engineer, Engineering Tools Group
Pace
x27;t have read access to, they get:
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
OPTIONS request for 'http://svn.example.com/svn/svntest1/Private/Area'
Again, "Forbidden" is "unexpected".
Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked
On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote:
>>
[snip]
>> Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anything?
>
> Looks like this was improved in trunk ages ago, but not backported
> to 1.6.x. Can y
On 16/07/10 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote:
>> On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote:
>>>>
>> [snip]
>>>> Has
On 16/07/10 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote:
>> On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote:
>>>>
>> [snip]
>>>> Has
this unusual? Does it suggest some data has gone missing, or what?
Nothing I saw in the release notes suggest repository efficiencies of
this order - I have _not_ packed the repository.
Cheers,
John.
--
John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.o
On 28/07/10 10:50, B Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:01, John Beranek wrote:
>>
>> I maintain a 76000 revision Subversion 1.5 repository that add up to a
>> 101GiB FSFS db.
>>
>> I'm looking to upgrade to 1.6, so did a dump and load
sword $pass \
https://versiontest1.divxnetworks.com/svn-proxy-sync \
file:///data/svn
On another note (if practical) I can tell you that svnsync via the
svn:// protocol is _much_ quicker than via http(s).
John.
--
John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it's possible/safe to run a Subversion mirror
using a later version of Subversion than the master runs. Specifically
I'd want to be able to run a slave server with Subversion 1.6.15 with
write-through proxying to a Subversion 1.4.6 server.
Cheers,
John.
//www.wandisco.com/ubersvn/
CollabNet Subversion Edge: http://www.collab.net/downloads/subversion
Cheers,
John
--
John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
2009/12/18 Alec Kloss :
> Subject pretty much says it all. My 1.6.4 client does allow adding
> files with an @ in their name.
$ svn add "a...@a@"
A a...@a
;)
John.
2009/12/18 John Beranek :
> 2009/12/18 Alec Kloss :
>> Subject pretty much says it all. My 1.6.4 client does allow adding
>> files with an @ in their name.
>
> $ svn add "a...@a@"
> A a...@a
Chatper 3, page 90 of the Subversion book.
John.
s):
http://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject=Fedora%3A10&p=1&q=subversion
Cheers,
John.
--
John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
13 matches
Mail list logo