Access control client error messages very poor?

response to OPTIONS request for 'http://svn.example.com/svn/svntest1/Private/Area' Again, "Forbidden" is "unexpected". Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anything? Cheers, John. -- John Beranek, Senior Software Engineer, Engineering Tools Group Pace

Access control client error messages very poor?

x27;t have read access to, they get: svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to OPTIONS request for 'http://svn.example.com/svn/svntest1/Private/Area' Again, "Forbidden" is "unexpected". Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> [snip] >> Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anything? > > Looks like this was improved in trunk ages ago, but not backported > to 1.6.x. Can y

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

On 16/07/10 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >>>> >> [snip] >>>> Has

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

On 16/07/10 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >>>> >> [snip] >>>> Has

Repository shrinkage on conversion 1.5 -> 1.6?

this unusual? Does it suggest some data has gone missing, or what? Nothing I saw in the release notes suggest repository efficiencies of this order - I have _not_ packed the repository. Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.o

Re: Repository shrinkage on conversion 1.5 -> 1.6?

On 28/07/10 10:50, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:01, John Beranek wrote: >> >> I maintain a 76000 revision Subversion 1.5 repository that add up to a >> 101GiB FSFS db. >> >> I'm looking to upgrade to 1.6, so did a dump and load

Re: Subversion 1.6 write-through proxy mirroring

sword $pass \ https://versiontest1.divxnetworks.com/svn-proxy-sync \ file:///data/svn On another note (if practical) I can tell you that svnsync via the svn:// protocol is _much_ quicker than via http(s). John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake

SVN mirror with newer Subversion version?

Hi, Can anyone tell me if it's possible/safe to run a Subversion mirror using a later version of Subversion than the master runs. Specifically I'd want to be able to run a slave server with Subversion 1.6.15 with write-through proxying to a Subversion 1.4.6 server. Cheers, John.

Re: Hardware requirements for windows subversion

//www.wandisco.com/ubersvn/ CollabNet Subversion Edge: http://www.collab.net/downloads/subversion Cheers, John -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake

Re: Subversion 1.6.6 doesn't appear to allow adding files with @ in the name

2009/12/18 Alec Kloss : > Subject pretty much says it all.  My 1.6.4 client does allow adding > files with an @ in their name. $ svn add "a...@a@" A a...@a ;) John.

Re: Subversion 1.6.6 doesn't appear to allow adding files with @ in the name

2009/12/18 John Beranek : > 2009/12/18 Alec Kloss : >> Subject pretty much says it all.  My 1.6.4 client does allow adding >> files with an @ in their name. > > $ svn add "a...@a@" > A         a...@a Chatper 3, page 90 of the Subversion book. John.

Re: current 1.6 for Fedora 10 - how to get / install?

s): http://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject=Fedora%3A10&p=1&q=subversion Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature