Re: svn move doesn't appear to take absolute paths

On 22.05.2014 17:05, Dan Ellis wrote: > c:\>svn mv "c:\project_files\sandbox\foo\Bar" > "C:\project_files\sandbox\foo\bar" > svn: E155004: Run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' > for details) > svn: E155004: Working copy 'C:\Project_files\sandbox\foo\Bar' locked. > svn: E155004

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On 18.10.11 16:20, Igor d wrote: > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you > propose me to checkout??? You are crazy? Move your old, existing working copy out of the way, check out a new one in it's place, use WinMerge to copy the changed source files from the old to t

Re: Apache SVN Repo upgrade to 1.7.0?

On 11.10.11 20:09, Dave Huang wrote: > On 10/11/2011 1:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote: > > But the bottom of the page displays this message: Powered by > > Subversion version 1.6.17 (r1128011). > > Which page is that? The bottom of > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/s

Re: 1.7 'svn upgrade' issue on windows vista

On 09.08.2011 08:54, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > I don't think the folder containing the root of a WC should have to > have the exact same name as the folder in the repository it > corresponds to. As this is a feature to me, I hope that 1.7 isn't > going to break this. It is a bug, and it has been fi

Re: Exclude a directory from a copy.

On 24.06.11 05:17, Gavin Baumanis wrote: > Initially I thought I would check if there was some "little gem" to > be used that would do it without me having to the extra work of > manually; > > * Deleting the unwanted directory from myNewBranch > * Reverting the delete in the trunk after reintegra

Re: Server based versioning without Working Copy

On 03.04.2011 20:23, Jonas Neef wrote: > Is there a possibility to disable the working copy system used by > svn? It's kinda unusual to use it that way, but since Subversion's HTTP protocol is based on WebDAV you can mount it like any other WebDAV folder: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/sv

Re: Subversion source code missing ??

On 20.05.10 12:55, John Buehrer wrote: > Also confusing is the (pending?) cover page ... > > http://subversion.apache.org/ > > ... which has the same content as the main Apache page, ie, nothing > subversion-related : > > http://apache.org/ Here, subversion.apache.org looks exactly like Google'

Re: question

On 02/04/2010 23:13, Dirk wrote: > Idiot http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=apache+software+foundation+mailing+lists -- Kurt Bernhard Pruenner --- Haendelstrasse 17 --- 4020 Linz --- Austria ...It might be written "Mindfuck", but it's spelt "L-A-I-N"... np: Radian - Feedback Mikro, Citylights (Chi

Re: Network repository

On 19/02/2010 12:13, Andy Levy wrote: > You can easily run Subversion in a relatively small VM with storage > located on a SAN (which will appear as a local drive to the OS and > applications running on it) unless you've got a very large number of > users/amount of traffic. Or he could just run su