Hello Philip
> > Instead of "why is the second change not reported" it should be "why
> > is the first change reported".
> >
> > Relevant part of the script:
>
> At this point Subversion has recorded a timestamp for the file.
>
> > echo "2" > x
> > touch -m -t "20121231.00" x
> > svn -
Hello Stefan
Thank you for the quick and detailed response.
> > When changing the timestamp of a file to an earlier point in time and
> leaving the file size unchanged yet altering the content, Subversion is
> not always able to detect this change.
> > The attached test case is the simplest we co
Hello Subversion Developers
We encountered a strange issue with Subversion 1.9.3 (running under RHEL 7).
The attached script demonstrates the behavior.
When changing the timestamp of a file to an earlier point in time and leaving
the file size unchanged yet altering the content, Subversion is n