>From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 3:33 PM
>
>On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:20:32PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 21:17:09 +0200:
>> > Andy Levy wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 15:04:29 -0400:
>> > > On Wed, Nov
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
>
> I'm pretty sure this works... although there was a bug with the group being
> able to create a branch in their allowed path if they didn't have read access
> to root. However, I think this was fixed in a recent version .10 or newer
> perhaps.
Suppose I have a bunch of projects, and I want to grant full access to a group,
but no access to anything else. Please don't call me anti-social.
/trunk/proja
/trunk/projb
/trunk/projc
I want to grant full access to proja to groupa, but no access to the others.
How can I do this?
[repo:/]
@g
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> A filesystem snapshot should present exactly the same scenario as a machine
> that
> lost power or crashed for some similar reason at that moment, so the question
> boils down to whether subversion can recover sensibly from a crash at any
3, 2010 8:03 AM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for filesystem snapshots (?)
On 2010-08-02 14:41:29 -0400, Vallon, Justin wrote:
> That is the situation I raised. If the network connection between
> the host that is modifying the repository and the filesystem that
> h
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> On 8/2/2010 3:46 PM, Vallon, Justin wrote:
> > That means filesystem snapshots pass the transactional test.
>
> Maybe - is there a guarantee that the app flushes to disk in the
> expected order? Or do snapshots take
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> users asking interesting questions:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/201008.mbox/%3c6ec02a00cc9f684daf4af4084ca84d5f01c40...@drmbx3.winmail.deshaw.com%3e
> i dunno how fsfs behaves in face of an interrupted commit; whethe
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:42:31PM -0400, Vallon, Justin wrote:
> > I did see that discussion, but it seems to contradict with the claim
> > that the database operations are transactional.
>
> This is a frequent misunde
From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> On 8/2/2010 11:42 AM, Vallon, Justin wrote:
> > So, my follow up is: If I unplug the network cable between svn-commiter
> > and filesystem, will the repository be corrupt?
> >
> > If yes, then the underlying
@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for filesystem snapshots (?)
On 8/2/2010 11:17 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:38:30AM -0400, Vallon, Justin wrote:
>> In the svn book,
>> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch05s03.html#svn-ch-5-sect-3.6 on
>> "Re
As far as I can tell, from the "vulnerability":
<<<
GENERATES A FULL SSL CERTIFICATE WHICH THE VICTIM'S BROWSER
WILL PROMPT HIM TO ACCEPT:
webmitm -dd
>>>
The user needs to accept the man-in-the-middle certificate.
--
-Justin
-Original Message-
From: Istace Emmanuel [mailto:istace.emm
In the svn book,
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch05s03.html#svn-ch-5-sect-3.6 on
"Repository Backup" describes some backup methods - hot copy, etc. Given that
enterprise-level filesystems generally support filesystem snapshots, what is
SVN's position on whether such snapshots are sufficie
12 matches
Mail list logo
