On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:08:28 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:17:59PM +0000, Dan Nessett wrote:
>> My question has to do with bypassing the fetch of the complete new MW
>> version into our repository. (NB: MW revisions run about 150MB). Let me
>>
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:17:59 +, Dan Nessett wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:55:08 +0200, Olivier Sannier wrote:
>
>> On 14/10/2010 21:45, Dan Nessett wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:38:41 -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I develop for
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:55:08 +0200, Olivier Sannier wrote:
> On 14/10/2010 21:45, Dan Nessett wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:38:41 -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
>>
>>>> I develop for a site that uses Mediawiki (MW). We make some
>>>> modifications to
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:33:04 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:55:08PM +0200, Olivier Sannier wrote:
>> On 14/10/2010 21:45, Dan Nessett wrote:
>> >On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:38:41 -0400, Bob Archer wrote:
>> >>>Generally, (using subver
; the
>> files in the MW repository with files in our repository and I am not
>> sure subversion allows that.
>>
>>
> There is a whole section in the svn book about this...
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-
book.html#svn.advanced.vendorbr
>
> BOb
I have read this section. It is about vendor drops, but it doesn't answer
the question I asked. Basically, we are doing a vendor drop now.
Dan
--
-- Dan Nessett
e are
"overloading" the files in the MW repository with files in our repository and I
am not sure subversion allows that.
Regards,
Dan Nessett