> 1st, thank you Jeremy!
No problem. Out of the thousands of people that download the binary,
to have only a handful of complaints isn't bad. ;)
> 2nd, from a sysadmin perspective, I appreciate that the installation
> process doesn't presume to know where everything goes. Having one
> complete
This may not be the right forum and I apologize for that, but here goes.
1st, thank you Jeremy!
2nd, from a sysadmin perspective, I appreciate that the installation
process doesn't presume to know where everything goes. Having one
complete install structure has several advantage, like seeing how
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 20:56, Matt Harrison wrote:
>
>> ...please don't do that again.
>>
>> is it asking too much to choose where to install it? or at least using
>> something standard like /usr/local with soft links into /usr/local/bin?
>
Well, that turkey is me. There are actually a few things
On Mar 24, 2010, at 20:56, Matt Harrison wrote:
> ...please don't do that again.
>
> is it asking too much to choose where to install it? or at least using
> something standard like /usr/local with soft links into /usr/local/bin?
I'm not familiar with other operating systems, but it's customar
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:17, Bob Archer wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:11, Bob Archer wrote:
>> >> Subject: @ the turkey who compiled OSX svn 1.6 with hardcoded path of
>> >> /opt/subversion...
>> >>
>> >> ...please don't do th
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:11, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> Subject: @ the turkey who compiled OSX svn 1.6 with hardcoded path of
> >> /opt/subversion...
> >>
> >> ...please don't do that again.
> >>
> >> is it asking too much to choose
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:11, Bob Archer wrote:
>> Subject: @ the turkey who compiled OSX svn 1.6 with hardcoded path of
>> /opt/subversion...
>>
>> ...please don't do that again.
>>
>> is it asking too much to choose where to install it? or at least us
> Subject: @ the turkey who compiled OSX svn 1.6 with hardcoded path of
> /opt/subversion...
>
> ...please don't do that again.
>
> is it asking too much to choose where to install it? or at least using
> something standard like /usr/local with soft links into /usr/loc
...please don't do that again.
is it asking too much to choose where to install it? or at least using
something standard like /usr/local with soft links into /usr/local/bin?
my opinion of CollabNet has dropped way down.
regards.
matt
