Hi,

Von: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Guten Tag Martin Bischoff,
> am Donnerstag, 2. August 2012 um 11:12 schrieben Sie:
> 
> > Since it is recommended to delete feature-branches after they were
> > reintegrated, why should this mergeinfo be kept?
> 
> Because there are scenarios where feature branches aren't deleted or even
> branched under the same name again for whatever reason. If you don't ever
> do that, ignore the merge info, but why bother unless performance is
> reduced or something?

And don't forget that branches are not really "deleted", they are still 
preserved in history, and can potentially be used for future merge and 
reverse-merge commands, or to create a new branch from them.

Also, the ongoing work on "symmetric merge" will enable you to keep your 
feature branches around, reusing them...

Best regards

Markus Schaber
-- 
___________________________
We software Automation.

3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax 
+49-831-54031-50

Email: m.scha...@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com 
CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com
Download CoDeSys sample projects: 
http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects

Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade 
register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915 

Reply via email to