Hi, Von: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de] > Guten Tag Martin Bischoff, > am Donnerstag, 2. August 2012 um 11:12 schrieben Sie: > > > Since it is recommended to delete feature-branches after they were > > reintegrated, why should this mergeinfo be kept? > > Because there are scenarios where feature branches aren't deleted or even > branched under the same name again for whatever reason. If you don't ever > do that, ignore the merge info, but why bother unless performance is > reduced or something?
And don't forget that branches are not really "deleted", they are still preserved in history, and can potentially be used for future merge and reverse-merge commands, or to create a new branch from them. Also, the ongoing work on "symmetric merge" will enable you to keep your feature branches around, reusing them... Best regards Markus Schaber -- ___________________________ We software Automation. 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH Markus Schaber | Developer Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax +49-831-54031-50 Email: m.scha...@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com Download CoDeSys sample projects: http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915