We have work directories shared between many physical machines here (via sshfs,
nfs, etc). We also use subversion as our configuration management system for
source files.
When a newer client ends up on on of the work machines, it automatically (and
silently) upgrades the wc metadata format of a
[mailto:tzueskj...@snkmail.com]
Sent: Mon 4/12/2010 9:17 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Automatic upgrade of wc format annoying on shared drives
We have work directories shared between many physical machines here (via sshfs,
nfs, etc). We also use subversion as our configuration management
Jeremy Mordkoff wrote:
I second that. I support fedora 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (and soon 12), various
ubuntu releases, plus windows XP, Vista, and Win7, and Mac OS 10.4,
10.5. When one of them upgrades, it causes me to scramble to build and
deploy upgrades to the others.
But working copies should r
Simon wrote on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 01:17 -:
> I think correct behaviour here is that the client should at least
> prompt the user to ask if it should upgrade the wc metadata format
> before messing with the working copy.
>
> Failing that, is there some way of locking a working copy to
> a part
On 13/04/2010, at 18:46 , Daniel Shahaf d.s-at-daniel.shahaf.name |
subversion users list| wrote:
Simon wrote on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 01:17 -:
I think correct behaviour here is that the client should at least
prompt the user to ask if it should upgrade the wc metadata format
before messing
> Jeremy Mordkoff wrote:
> > I second that. I support fedora 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (and soon 12),
various
> > ubuntu releases, plus windows XP, Vista, and Win7, and Mac OS 10.4,
> > 10.5. When one of them upgrades, it causes me to scramble to build
and
> > deploy upgrades to the others.
> >
>
> But work
Jeremy Mordkoff wrote:
I second that. I support fedora 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (and soon 12),
various
ubuntu releases, plus windows XP, Vista, and Win7, and Mac OS 10.4,
10.5. When one of them upgrades, it causes me to scramble to build
and
deploy upgrades to the others.
But working copies should
Jeremy Mordkoff wrote:
>>> I second that. I support fedora 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (and soon 12),
> various
>>> ubuntu releases, plus windows XP, Vista, and Win7, and Mac OS 10.4,
>>> 10.5. When one of them upgrades, it causes me to scramble to build
> and
>>> deploy upgrades to the others.
>>>
>> But wor
