Bert Huijben wrote on Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:08:00 +:
Yes, we probably should.
Looks like you just did, in r1666832. Thanks. Nominate it for backport?
% nominate.pl r1666832 Resolves an assertion
:-)
Daniel
The problem here is an editor that drives a file or directory add in a
On 14 March 2015 at 22:57, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for noting that this is related to the github implementation.
When Subversion recovers from an so called ‘incomplete’ update, it sends
other information to the server, but the github Subversion
Yes, we probably should.
The problem here is an editor that drives a file or directory add in a location
that already has a BASE (‘status normal’) node. That should never happen,
because the reporter just told the server that this node is there).
But github only uses some bits of the
.
Bert
From: pany...@gmail.com [mailto:pany...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yaroslav Panych
Sent: zaterdag 14 maart 2015 19:40
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Exception: libsvn_wc\update_editor.c line 1550: assertion failed
(action == svn_wc_conflict_action_delete)
Hello
Hello devs.
Got Tsvn exception while updating repository frim github (
https://github.com/cplussharp/graph-studio-next/)
Actually it happens if initial checkout from repo was canceled by user(for
some reason) and then(after cleanup command) user initiated update command.
If checkout perforemed to
