On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course you _can_ secure it. My point is that permitting ssh and
restricting access to ssh by itself is very likely to make your system less
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/2/2011 9:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access, disable or
block other services at the firewall,
If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what
On 1/5/2011 1:04 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access,
disable or
block other services at the firewall,
If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what are
the odds that port tunneling or ssh's built
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course you _can_ secure it. My point is that permitting ssh and
restricting access to ssh by itself is very likely to make your system less
secure (if you count on firewall protections) instead of more so. And
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/2/2011 9:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access, disable or
block other services at the firewall,
If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what
On 1/2/2011 9:43 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's possible to do secure Subversion. Use svn+ssh access, disable or
block other services at the firewall,
If ssh is permitted and you didn't personally set it up, what are the
odds that port tunneling or ssh's built in socks proxy will allow
