Re: Is there a non-interactive way to do a "your version first, then theirs" merge?

2014-04-01 Thread JP
Thanks for the idea, Atle. I'll try it. -JP On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 3:46 AM, Ræstad Atle Eivind wrote: > In the meantime, can you think of any workaround ... As a workaround you might use Expect (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expect) in your script. /Atle

RE: Is there a non-interactive way to do a "your version first, then theirs" merge?

2014-04-01 Thread Ræstad Atle Eivind
> In the meantime, can you think of any workaround ... As a workaround you might use Expect (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expect) in your script. /Atle

Re: Is there a non-interactive way to do a "your version first, then theirs" merge?

2014-03-31 Thread JP
Thanks a lot Stefan. At your suggestion I added this as an enhancement request: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4487 I don't have any opinion on whether a new --accept option or an entirely new flag is best. I defer to your experience and judgment there. Thanks very much t

Re: Is there a non-interactive way to do a "your version first, then theirs" merge?

2014-03-31 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:36:10AM -0700, JP wrote: > I'm currently using svn 1.8.5 on the client and 1.8.3 on the server. > > > If you attempt to "svn merge" a text file from the command-line where > the same line has been modified in both file versions, you will see a > report of the conflict

Is there a non-interactive way to do a "your version first, then theirs" merge?

2014-03-31 Thread JP
I'm currently using svn 1.8.5 on the client and 1.8.3 on the server. If you attempt to "svn merge" a text file from the command-line where the same line has been modified in both file versions, you will see a report of the conflict, followed by this menu: Select: (p) postpone, (df) show diff,