Christophe Royer wrote on Sat, 14 May 2022 23:28 +00:00:
> Thank you for looking into this, taking the time to clean up the script
> and share your comments. Lessons learnt.
>
> I will likely revert (maybe manually) those invalid mergeinfo.
>
Sure. I recommend that you use a record-only reverse
Thank you for looking into this, taking the time to clean up the script
and share your comments. Lessons learnt.
I will likely revert (maybe manually) those invalid mergeinfo.
Still not quite sure of the consequences, and if this situation could be
detected. Maybe a defect or enhancement
Christophe Royer wrote on Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:45:14 -0700:
> Daniel, the first script I sent may confuse things a little, because of the
> tree conflict.
> Here is another script that avoid that issue. The problem is the same: it
> looks like the mergeinfo does not match the state of the
Daniel, the first script I sent may confuse things a little, because of
the tree conflict.
Here is another script that avoid that issue. The problem is the same:
it looks like the mergeinfo does not match the state of the branch.
-start of 2nd script
@ECHO off
REM -- Script to test
Shahaf ; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: [External] Re: Question about mergeinfo and 2-url merge
Thank you Daniel, below is the script I used (line wrapping might mess up a few
lines, sorry)
As I was cleaning it up, I realized that in 1.6.17 (yes, still using it, and
where I saw
Thank you Daniel, below is the script I used (line wrapping might mess
up a few lines, sorry)
As I was cleaning it up, I realized that in 1.6.17 (yes, still using it,
and where I saw the issue first) the behavior is different (2-url merge
gives me a tree conflict).
I am really tempted to
Could you post the script, please? It's hard to answer your question
when it describes the details verbally rather than machine-readably.
It sounds like a supported scenario.
Cheers,
Daniel
Christophe Royer wrote on Fri, 06 May 2022 21:46 +00:00:
> I recently saw some mergeinfo that I can
I recently saw some mergeinfo that I can explain but still look wrong to
me. Not sure if it’s a wrong usage of svn, or possibly a defect, and so
far I have not seen any post about this. Here is the scenario (I have a
script, batch file for windows, if needed):
Seen first using svn 1.6.17,
