Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Geoff Hoffman
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Ryan Schmidt < subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:16, Giulio Troccoli wrote: > > > Ok, have you tried ignoring just logs rather than all files, I mean svn > ps svn:ignore logs ? > > The logs directory has already been added and comm

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:16, Giulio Troccoli wrote: > Ok, have you tried ignoring just logs rather than all files, I mean svn ps > svn:ignore logs ? The logs directory has already been added and committed; telling Subversion to now ignore it will do nothing useful.

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Geoff Hoffman
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Giulio Troccoli < giulio.trocc...@mediatelgroup.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 19/03/12 17:11, Geoff Hoffman wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Giulio Troccoli < > giulio.trocc...@mediatelgroup.co.uk> wrote: > >> Do you mean that the files are shown with an

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Giulio Troccoli
On 19/03/12 17:11, Geoff Hoffman wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Giulio Troccoli > wrote: Do you mean that the files are shown with an A in the first column? No, they're shown as ? logs/error.log ? logs/access.log But they're not

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Geoff Hoffman
Ahhh Rats. Thanks I missed that. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > in that same directory. -- This email, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, pleas

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Geoff Hoffman wrote: > > Mark, I believe you, however I don't see which part of the docs you link > to addresses this case... > This part: When found on a versioned directory, the svn:ignore property is expected to contain a list of newline-delimited file pattern

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Geoff Hoffman
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Giulio Troccoli < giulio.trocc...@mediatelgroup.co.uk> wrote: > Do you mean that the files are shown with an A in the first column? No, they're shown as ? logs/error.log ? logs/access.log But they're not automagically ignored, even though they match "logs/*" wh

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Geoff Hoffman wrote: > I ran into an unexpected behavior with svn:ignore today and wanted to see if > someone can verify whether this is a bug (in the current version) or just an > aspect of how Subversion works. We're still on 1.6x. > > Given a tree with > > trun

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:26, Geoff Hoffman wrote: > I ran into an unexpected behavior with svn:ignore today and wanted to see if > someone can verify whether this is a bug (in the current version) or just an > aspect of how Subversion works. We're still on 1.6x. > > Given a tree with > > trunk >

Re: Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Giulio Troccoli
On 19/03/12 16:26, Geoff Hoffman wrote: I ran into an unexpected behavior with svn:ignore today and wanted to see if someone can verify whether this is a bug (in the current version) or just an aspect of how Subversion works. We're still on 1.6x. Given a tree with trunk + cache + htdo

Quirk with svn:ignore

2012-03-19 Thread Geoff Hoffman
I ran into an unexpected behavior with svn:ignore today and wanted to see if someone can verify whether this is a bug (in the current version) or just an aspect of how Subversion works. We're still on 1.6x. Given a tree with trunk + cache + htdocs + logs + system I have tried putting