RE: Infamous Item is not readable for svn log

2010-02-26 Thread Bob Archer
Did you attempt to pass your user credentials with the svn log command? Yes. There is a discussion regarding that here: http://subversion.open.collab.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3viewType=b rowseAlldsMessageId=173879 I think setting up a guest username with no password is the

Re: Infamous Item is not readable for svn log

2010-02-26 Thread David Brodbeck
On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Bob Archer wrote: I think setting up a guest username with no password is the easiest way to go. That's how we're doing it on our repository. It's a little clumsy, but workable for our user population. Baring that setting up apache for anon requests and svn for

Re: Infamous Item is not readable for svn log

2010-02-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Brodbeck bro...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Bob Archer wrote: Baring that setting up apache for anon requests and svn for authenticated. That would also work.  In our case we didn't really want the added complexity of Apache --

Re: Infamous Item is not readable for svn log

2010-02-26 Thread Nerius Landys
You can also put them both on Apache, then there's not that much confusion. That's how we do it: two Location blocks in Apache, both backed by the same repository: Hrm, I was kind of hoping to avoid using httpd.