You're welcome and I *really* appreciated the opportunity to set the
record straight. Whenever you put your head above the parapet...
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> David,
>
> Ok, thanks for settings the record straight. These nuances are important to
> me.
>
> I def
David,
Ok, thanks for settings the record straight. These nuances are important to me.
I definitely like the passion you guys have, the big plans, and the
intention to "take the bull by the horns" :-). I hope you can get the
ball rolling, with an actively participating community, and make
Subvers
Johan,
Firstly, thank you for caring about Subversion - we *do*, passionately.
1. The feeling of a lack of progress is not new and it's not just
"WANdisco's big customers" as you put it. I don't think I am blaming any
individual - it's just a fact of life as I said "*We are not happy with the
vol
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:32 PM, David Richards wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the future of
>> > Subversion, from a technic
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub
> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the
> future of
> > Subversion, from a technical point of view.
> >
> > On the other hand, the underlayi
David,
Absolutely correct!
Your analysis / explanation is much better than my own. Thank you.
- David
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, David Weintraub wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Pablo Beltran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the future of
> Subversion, from a technical point of view.
>
> On the other hand, the underlaying message scares me. The message is clear:
> Apache can't drive the development
Hi,
I have no doubt about those all features will be good for the future of
Subversion, from a technical point of view.
On the other hand, the underlaying message scares me. The message is clear:
Apache can't drive the development process by itself and only Wandisco can
do it in the right way and
