Markus Schaber wrote on Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:11:57 +0200:
> Von: Daniel Shahaf
> > Perhaps you'd be interested in contributing to the implementation of
> > this feature?
>
> Yes, I am, but I've only very limited time to work on it while being at
> home.
I see. Hope you find the time for it :)
2011/7/26 Feldhacker, Chris :
>> I wonder if people will expect a script named "detach" to copy or do they
>> think it will move?
>
> More like "extract" or "promote" -- promoting a child folder to become a
> full-fledged, independent working copy...
>
> "liberate"? Kinda like that... :-)
>
"
> I wonder if people will expect a script named "detach" to copy or do they
> think it will move?
More like "extract" or "promote" -- promoting a child folder to become a
full-fledged, independent working copy...
"liberate"? Kinda like that... :-)
-Message Disclaimer-
This e-mail
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> Because it interests me, I implemented a simple 'detach' script, which
> you can find here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/tools/client-side/detach.py
>
> It's very hacky, and I do, of course, disclaim any harm which m
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Markus Schaber wrote on Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 15:57:00 +0200:
>> Hi, Stefan,
>>
>> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>> > > So I'm not only "detaching" subdirectories, but also "re-implanting"
>> > > them afterwards.
>> >
>> > Sound
Markus Schaber wrote on Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 15:57:00 +0200:
> Hi, Stefan,
>
> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > > So I'm not only "detaching" subdirectories, but also "re-implanting"
> > > them afterwards.
> >
> > Sounds like what you really need is this as-of-yet not implemented
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:04:02PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> My most common (ab-)usage is to use this as a poor man's local branch
> feature. I'm working on some long-term task (e. G. some large
> refactoring or new feature), and get interrupted by some short fix which
> has to be developed on
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:27:04PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Stefan,
>
> > Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
>
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:37:36AM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> > > Hi, Stefan,
> > >
> > > Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > > >> [Detaching of su
On 7/25/11 3:22 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
I am not aware of any existing developer who expressed interest in working
on 'svn detach'.
Just curious: what drove the original WC design where each subdirectory was
inherently independent? And is this the same set of developers?
--
Les Mikes
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:37:36AM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Stefan,
>
> Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> >> [Detaching of subdirectories of working copies]
> > Honestly, we simply don't know how many people need this.
>
> Strictly speaking, it is not "needed" by anyone - o
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 09:03:05AM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Stefan Sperling,
> am Montag, 25. Juli 2011 um 00:22 schrieben Sie:
>
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2884
>
> As the target of this enhancement is 1.8-consider and the last comment
> questions
Guten Tag Stefan Sperling,
am Montag, 25. Juli 2011 um 00:22 schrieben Sie:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2884
As the target of this enhancement is 1.8-consider and the last comment
questions the need of this features in general, should one vote for
the enhancement? Or is
CC += dev@
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 17:08:14 -0500:
>
> On Jul 24, 2011, at 16:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Ryan Brothers wrote on Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 17:42:43 -0400:
> >> Is there a way to create a new top-level checkout of a subdirectory
> >> with the 1.7 working copy form
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 05:08:14PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2011, at 16:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Ryan Brothers wrote on Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 17:42:43 -0400:
> >> Is there a way to create a new top-level checkout of a subdirectory
> >> with the 1.7 working copy format?
> >
On Jul 24, 2011, at 16:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ryan Brothers wrote on Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 17:42:43 -0400:
>> Is there a way to create a new top-level checkout of a subdirectory
>> with the 1.7 working copy format?
>
> Just copying a dir isn't supported.
It worked fine in 1.6.x and earlier.
Ryan Brothers wrote on Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 17:42:43 -0400:
> Is there a way to create a new top-level checkout of a subdirectory
> with the 1.7 working copy format?
Just copying a dir isn't supported. (the plan has been to provide a new
subcommand for that, but that won't happen before 1.8)
You
16 matches
Mail list logo
