RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-22 Thread Bob Archer
> in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows. Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host on windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms FUD is going to be bad for svn if it is widely said and published. > what are common rea

RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-22 Thread Michael Hüttermann
are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you drive a Windows shop) ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit. Am Freitag, den 22.04.2011, 10:39 +0200 schrieb Bob Archer : in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows. Why? We are a wi

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-22 Thread Andy Levy
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:39, Bob Archer wrote: >>  in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows. > > Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host on > windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms FUD is going > to be bad for svn if

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400: > But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing, we > get 403 Forbidden errors because no rules match - the user is > committing to code and the rule checks for Code, case-sensitive. > > It's an easy enough fix on the clie

RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-22 Thread kmradke
Bob Archer wrote on 04/22/2011 09:39:03 AM: > > > in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows. > > Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host > on windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms > FUD is going to be bad for svn if

RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-24 Thread Michael Hüttermann
thank you all for your feedback. I've incorporated your comments. It would really be bad to prefer SVN as the VCS in a book, but writing counterproductive or misleading things, so I'm really glad that you've helped. If someone is interested in seeing that printed, the book is "Agile ALM", and

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-24 Thread Bob Aiello
Hi Mike, I recently had a client who insisted on VisualSVN on Windows. It was a very quick and easy setup. I would normally always put the repo on Linux, but some folks are just more comfortable with what they know or they may not even have a linux server.. Bob http://www.linkedin.com/in/Bo

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Andy Levy
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400: >> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing, we >> get 403 Forbidden errors because no rules match - the user is >> committing to code and the rule checks for Code

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:26:47 -0400: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400: > >> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing, we > >> get 403 Forbidden errors because no rules match

RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: 26 April 2011 11:48 > To: Andy Levy > Cc: Bob Archer; Michael Hüttermann; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: repo on Windows -- why not? > > Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:26:47 -0400: >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400: >> >> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 13:58:08 -0400: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:26:47 -0400: > >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf > >> wrote: > >> > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400: >

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > I don't know what releases the bug may be in --- I use > a case-insensitive filesystem. Heh. I'm certainly not missing the absence of a negation here. Or: there's one too many, isn't there? -- Johan

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 21:36:41 +0200: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > I don't know what releases the bug may be in --- I use > > a case-insensitive filesystem. > > Heh. I'm certainly not missing the absence of a negation here. Or: > there's o

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-28 Thread Danil Shopyrin
> are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you drive > a Windows shop) > ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit. It's also very important to integrate Subversion seamlessly with Active Directory and other existing Windows infrastructure (it applies to Windows sh

Re: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-28 Thread Blair Zajac
On 4/28/11 9:42 AM, Danil Shopyrin wrote: are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you drive a Windows shop) ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit. It's also very important to integrate Subversion seamlessly with Active Directory and other existing Windows i

RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-28 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Blair Zajac [mailto:bl...@orcaware.com] > Sent: donderdag 28 april 2011 19:39 > To: Danil Shopyrin > Cc: Michael Hüttermann; Bob Archer; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: repo on Windows -- why not? > > On 4/28/11 9:42

RE: repo on Windows -- why not?

2011-04-28 Thread kmradke
"Bert Huijben" wrote on 04/28/2011 01:18:09 PM: > > On 4/28/11 9:42 AM, Danil Shopyrin wrote: > > >> are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you > > drive > > >> a Windows shop) > > >> ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit. > > > > > > It's also very importan