> in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows.
Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host on
windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms FUD is going to
be bad for svn if it is widely said and published.
> what are common rea
are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you
drive a Windows shop)
ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit.
Am Freitag, den 22.04.2011, 10:39 +0200 schrieb Bob Archer
:
in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows.
Why? We are a wi
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:39, Bob Archer wrote:
>> in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows.
>
> Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host on
> windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms FUD is going
> to be bad for svn if
Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400:
> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing, we
> get 403 Forbidden errors because no rules match - the user is
> committing to code and the rule checks for Code, case-sensitive.
>
> It's an easy enough fix on the clie
Bob Archer wrote on 04/22/2011 09:39:03 AM:
>
> > in most cases, you don't want to host a SVN repository on Windows.
>
> Why? We are a windows "shop" and we have windows servers and we host
> on windows. I've seen zero problems. I think this type of anti-ms
> FUD is going to be bad for svn if
thank you all for your feedback. I've incorporated your comments.
It would really be bad to prefer SVN as the VCS in a book, but writing
counterproductive or misleading things, so I'm really glad that you've
helped.
If someone is interested in seeing that printed, the book is "Agile
ALM", and
Hi Mike,
I recently had a client who insisted on VisualSVN on Windows. It was a
very quick and easy setup. I would normally always put the repo on
Linux, but some folks are just more comfortable with what they know or
they may not even have a linux server..
Bob
http://www.linkedin.com/in/Bo
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400:
>> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing, we
>> get 403 Forbidden errors because no rules match - the user is
>> committing to code and the rule checks for Code
Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:26:47 -0400:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400:
> >> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing, we
> >> get 403 Forbidden errors because no rules match
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: 26 April 2011 11:48
> To: Andy Levy
> Cc: Bob Archer; Michael Hüttermann; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: repo on Windows -- why not?
>
> Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:26:47 -0400:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400:
>> >> But our authz file is written as [Code:/path] and when committing
Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 13:58:08 -0400:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Andy Levy wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:26:47 -0400:
> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Andy Levy wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:56:14 -0400:
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I don't know what releases the bug may be in --- I use
> a case-insensitive filesystem.
Heh. I'm certainly not missing the absence of a negation here. Or:
there's one too many, isn't there?
--
Johan
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 21:36:41 +0200:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > I don't know what releases the bug may be in --- I use
> > a case-insensitive filesystem.
>
> Heh. I'm certainly not missing the absence of a negation here. Or:
> there's o
> are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you drive
> a Windows shop)
> ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit.
It's also very important to integrate Subversion seamlessly with
Active Directory and other existing Windows infrastructure (it applies
to Windows sh
On 4/28/11 9:42 AM, Danil Shopyrin wrote:
are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that you drive
a Windows shop)
ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit.
It's also very important to integrate Subversion seamlessly with
Active Directory and other existing Windows i
> -Original Message-
> From: Blair Zajac [mailto:bl...@orcaware.com]
> Sent: donderdag 28 april 2011 19:39
> To: Danil Shopyrin
> Cc: Michael Hüttermann; Bob Archer; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: repo on Windows -- why not?
>
> On 4/28/11 9:42
"Bert Huijben" wrote on 04/28/2011 01:18:09 PM:
> > On 4/28/11 9:42 AM, Danil Shopyrin wrote:
> > >> are there any arguments to prefer Windows? (beside arguments that
you
> > drive
> > >> a Windows shop)
> > >> ok, looks like I have to adjust the section a bit.
> > >
> > > It's also very importan
18 matches
Mail list logo