Does anyone on this list have a pointer to a repo that hosts the latest 32-bit
(i686) Subversion binaries for RHEL 6? I’ve been using the WANdisco SVN Repo
1.9 (http://opensource.wandisco.com/centos/6/svn-1.9/RPMS), but it only has
version 1.9.5-1 for 64-bit (x86_64). The latest 32-bit binarie
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> Does anyone on this list have a pointer to a repo that hosts the latest
> 32-bit (i686) Subversion binaries for RHEL 6? I’ve been using the WANdisco
> SVN Repo 1.9 (http://opensource.wandisco.com/centos/6/svn-1.9/RPMS), but it
> only ha
We are not quite ready to move to CentOS 7 yet, but hopefully will soon.
However, I don’t understand why the dependencies are different for i686
and x86_64 on the same CentOS 6 platform for Subversion 1.9.X. Up to
version 1.9.4-1, WANdisco provided binaries for both architectures.
Alfred
> On A
Alfred:
You can blame me for the decision to prune out the 32-bit platform support
from WANdisco.
I can easily admit to being premature, but I'm finding less demand for
32-bit and really
question why anyone would continue to run 32-bit at this time? If you
could help me understand
then perhaps I
FWIW, I recently made the same decision for the packages we provide at
CollabNet. We have stopped providing 32-bit versions for all platforms.
Mark
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Doug Robinson
wrote:
> Alfred:
>
> You can blame me for the decision to prune out the 32-bit platform support
> f
Hi Doug:
The reason is pretty simple: we develop embedded software for a 32-bit platform
and compile for both the target (using a cross compiler) and also natively so
we can run unit and integration tests on our CentOS workstations. Our
application is not (yet) 64-bit compatible. Now I know I
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> We are not quite ready to move to CentOS 7 yet, but hopefully will soon.
> However, I don’t understand why the dependencies are different for i686
> and x86_64 on the same CentOS 6 platform for Subversion 1.9.X. Up to
> version 1.9.4-1,
Alfred:
One last question: are there any specific Subversion bugs that you need
fixed? What I'm getting at is that sitting on an old OS platform comes
with some costs. And, for the most part, unless you're being burned by a
specific Subversion bug, why upgrade?
Cheers:
Doug
On Tue, Apr 11, 20
Doug:
Mostly we are interested in the client-side merge improvements. We occasionally
run into some weird merge errors/conflicts that require us to manually merge
eligible revisions from one branch to another.
Alfred
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 16:59, Doug Robinson wrote:
>
> Alfred:
>
> One las
