On 13 October 2010 19:19, David Weintraub qazw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
How would you access them if you don't have java/maven/ivy when you want to
retrieve a certain version?
Before we adopted our Ant projects to use
On 13 October 2010 21:42, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/13/2010 2:52 PM, BRM wrote:
From: Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com
We currently commit component binaries back into tags which are then
used by
other things with external references, and final binaries are managed
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Our C/C++ guys just use curl to POST the binaries to Nexus over
http... we also POST the .pom file and the .md5 and .sha1 files...
that is because one of their build toolchain envs cannot have Java on
On 10/14/2010 8:24 AM, David Weintraub wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Our C/C++ guys just use curl to POST the binaries to Nexus over
http... we also POST the .pom file and the .md5 and .sha1 files...
that is because one of their
What? You want a GOOD Maven manual? Real programmers don't use
manuals. We hack away for years in frustration and futility until we
die.
Maven is one of the WORST Unix documented projects I've seen. I know
of only two books: Maven: The Definitive Guide
http://www.sonatype.com/books/maven-book/
On 10/14/2010 3:11 PM, David Weintraub wrote:
What? You want a GOOD Maven manual? Real programmers don't use
manuals.
Yeah, I know - they don't write them either (except for subversion, of
course). As you might guess, I'm more of a system administrator than a
programmer...
Fortunately,
On 14 October 2010 22:03, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/14/2010 3:11 PM, David Weintraub wrote:
What? You want a GOOD Maven manual? Real programmers don't use
manuals.
Yeah, I know - they don't write them either (except for subversion, of
course). As you might guess, I'm
Hi,
So far I have been using svn in rather simple settings: at most some
branches and merges limited to one dev tree.
However, now I need to set up a repository for a project composed by several
modules where different subprojects (comprised by subsets of modules) need
to be compiled and
, October 13, 2010 12:05:43 PM
Subject: Repository organization for complex project
Hi,
So far I have been using svn in rather simple settings: at most some branches
and merges limited to one dev tree.
However, now I need to set up a repository for a project composed by several
modules where
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Mauro Adolfo San Martin Ramas
msmar...@userena.cl wrote:
However, now I need to set up a repository for a project composed by several
modules where different subprojects (comprised by subsets of modules) need
to be compiled and tested independently. Usually
On 10/13/2010 12:20 PM, David Weintraub wrote:
Maven repositories are great even if you don't have a Maven project.
They enforce the concept of version and type and give you easy access
to the object. Ant with the Ivy addition has no problems with them.
Maven, of course, uses them with aplomb.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
How would you access them if you don't have java/maven/ivy when you want to
retrieve a certain version?
Before we adopted our Ant projects to use Maven, we simply used the
get task. You can always download from a Maven
- Original Message
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
We currently commit component binaries back into tags which are then used by
other things with external references, and final binaries are managed
separately by project, but that seems wrong on several levels.
For the
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to find a generic scheme (and one that can be plugged into hudson
if possible) to store build results with a versioning scheme that doesn't
force you to keep them forever because most are obsolete after a few
On 10/13/2010 2:52 PM, BRM wrote:
From: Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com
We currently commit component binaries back into tags which are then used by
other things with external references, and final binaries are managed
separately by project, but that seems wrong on several levels.
For
- Original Message
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
To: BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com
On 10/13/2010 2:52 PM, BRM wrote:
From: Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com
We currently commit component binaries back into tags which are then
used
by
other things with external
16 matches
Mail list logo