Re: SVNCacheRevProps and other performance tweaks.

2014-05-16 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > On 5/15/14, 1:15 AM, Terry Dooher wrote: > > That's so much clearer now and sounds like something I can definitely > use. > > As I understand it, the downside is that the server will reveal path > components > > and filenames within restricted a

Re: SVNCacheRevProps and other performance tweaks.

2014-05-16 Thread Ben Reser
On 5/15/14, 1:15 AM, Terry Dooher wrote: > That's so much clearer now and sounds like something I can definitely use. > As I understand it, the downside is that the server will reveal path > components > and filenames within restricted areas during log operations? Don't think you quite understand

RE: SVNCacheRevProps and other performance tweaks.

2014-05-16 Thread Terry Dooher
From: Ben Reser Sent: 14 May 2014 20:07 > On 5/14/14, 10:11 AM, Terry Dooher wrote: >> SVNPathAuthz - Would short_circuit save me any processing time in this >> scenario or is it only useful for people with LDAP or other auth systems that >> might slow down request processing? > > short_circuit: T

SVNCacheRevProps and other performance tweaks.

2014-05-15 Thread Terry Dooher
Hi all, I've just finished a dump/load cycle on about 500GB worth of repositories to bring in the more efficient changes for FSFS in 1.8 (We're on 1.8.8 now). I'm looking at utilising some performance tweaks to make the most of the hardware the server is running on. Could someone clarify a coup

Re: SVNCacheRevProps and other performance tweaks.

2014-05-14 Thread Ben Reser
On 5/14/14, 10:11 AM, Terry Dooher wrote: > SVNPathAuthz – Currently ‘On’. To my understanding, the value ‘short_circuit’ > will prevent any other path-based authorisation being used for requests. I’m > running Apache2.4/mod_dav_svn, with local Basic Auth and local Authz files. No > network drives

Re: SVNCacheRevProps and other performance tweaks.

2014-05-14 Thread Ben Reser
On 5/14/14, 12:06 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > Actually I think it's more that you really must have this enabled if you have > revprop packing turned on. I can't think of a reason you don't want this turn > off other than desiring to reduce resource usage at the cost of slower > performance. Oops doub