Am 13.02.2012 23:07, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
...
Stefan,
Please be patient. Our new server is not yet back from service, so I
can't check. Furthermore I'll have to investigate to build from
sources, which I didn't do so far.
Thomas
--
Mecadtron GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Nürnberg
Amtsgericht
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:28:48PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:13:34PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> > I changed the property values to ^/... and now it is somewhat better but
> > there is still one referenced subproject that does not work! What can I
> > do here?
>
>
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:13:34PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> I changed the property values to ^/... and now it is somewhat better but
> there is still one referenced subproject that does not work! What can I
> do here?
Well, for a start, you'll have to show us exactly what you're seeing.
By now
Am 23.12.2011 14:59, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:12PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
Am 23.12.2011 13:08, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
Well, is the URL of this file in the same _repository_ as the working
copy root folder, or not? One server can serve multiple repositories so
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> We might need to revisit this and generated unique repos_id's based
> on the UUID only. Not sure if that can be made to work without a working
> copy format bump though. This would mean a fix could only be released in 1.8.
I've fi
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:12PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> Am 23.12.2011 13:08, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> >Well, is the URL of this file in the same _repository_ as the working
> >copy root folder, or not? One server can serve multiple repositories so
> >your statement doesn't clearly explain
Am 23.12.2011 13:08, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:05:43PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
Am 23.12.2011 02:52, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
Are you sure you checked out a new working copy before this happened?
The assertion only happens from the working copy checked out from the
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:05:43PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> Am 23.12.2011 02:52, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
> >Are you sure you checked out a new working copy before this happened?
>
> The assertion only happens from the working copy checked out from the
> new server.
> sqlite> select repos_id
Am 23.12.2011 02:52, schrieb Stefan Sperling:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:58AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:16:58PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
When I checkout a project the icons do not get the Tortoise overlay
icons and when I right click on the project directory
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:58AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:16:58PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> > When I checkout a project the icons do not get the Tortoise overlay
> > icons and when I right click on the project directory the Windows
> > shell crashes. This is a
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:16:58PM +0100, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered the following problem in subversion/TortoiseSVN.
>
> Background: We want to move our VisualSVN server from a W2k3 x86 to a
> new server hardware/OS W2k8 x64.
> I tried to move the repository by dumping/importing
Hi,
I encountered the following problem in subversion/TortoiseSVN.
Background: We want to move our VisualSVN server from a W2k3 x86 to a
new server hardware/OS W2k8 x64.
I tried to move the repository by dumping/importing to the new
subversion installation. In the first place I tried CollabNet S
12 matches
Mail list logo
