On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Zé jose.pas...@gmx.com wrote:
Besides
that, from my understanding filesystems do provide something which
could be argued as support for branches and tags because branches are
simply just work on something based on something other, which is
implemented as
On 05/13/2013 06:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
No, the basic difference is that VCS operating on the whole tree can
only have branches (and thus merge info) on the whole tree either, so
you*can't* go like subversion does and map branches into the tree and
need to have them (and tags) as a separate
Guten Tag Zé,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems
is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info
to those revisions, while Subversion doesn't.
Which useful info besides the name, and always
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
...
Let's put it this way: if that was actually a tag then it could also be
argued that any file system supports branching/tagging.
You ignore the versioning part of Subversion and that it guarantees
the state/history of
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the
difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks
complete revisions although sometimes it might generate or store
differences for some operations or
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the
difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks
complete revisions although
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote:
...
Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the
difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks
complete revisions
