Re: large db/revs files

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andre Harper wrote on Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:56:02 -0400: If I understand the skip-delta cost, which I may not completely, it sounds like each tagged release based on the trunk will occupy more space as it is farther away from the trunk revision number? Yes, unless directory deltification is

large db/revs files

2013-06-04 Thread Andre Harper
Hi, all – I am not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any responses. I am on a team that began using subversion near the end of last year. As a part of our process, we tag each successful run of our systems. This can mean thousands of tags for certain systems every six

Re: large db/revs files

2013-06-04 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Andre Harper, am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013 um 16:30 schrieben Sie: We’re having an issue with the db/revs directory size, which for all our projects currently exceeds 289G. We only use relatively small working directories containing less than a meg of text files; no binary files.

Re: large db/revs files

2013-06-04 Thread Mark Phippard
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Andre Harper harper.an...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, all – I am not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any responses. I am on a team that began using subversion near the end of last year. As a part of our process, we tag each successful run

Re: large db/revs files

2013-06-04 Thread olli hauer
On 2013-06-04 16:30, Andre Harper wrote: Hi, all – I am not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any responses. I am on a team that began using subversion near the end of last year. As a part of our process, we tag each successful run of our systems. This can mean