On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> I've encountered what I think is a problem with subversion, but I'm not
> completely sure (and according to the online instructions I should bring it
> up here prior to filing a bug).
Actually, the instructions on
http://subversion.apache.org/i
[ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. please put your reply
below or inline. More below ... ]
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
>> > I've encountered what I t
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 20:47:29 +0200:
> [ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. please put your reply
> below or inline. More below ... ]
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri
Thanks, Johan. I tested with 1.7rc4 and it did not make any perceptible
difference. Anything else I can try?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> > I've encountered what I think is a problem with subversion, but I'm not
What method of profiling do you recommend? I have used gprof previously
(it's been awhile) but am not familiar with the subversion project source
code and build setup. Is the a online guide or wiki describing the
preferred setup for performing this?
Kyle
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel S
gprof is what I'm familiar with (nutshell: compile with 'gcc -pg' and
read gmon.out). There are no specific profiling docs for svn; if you
need more specific advice please post to the dev@ list. Thanks!
Kyle Leber wrote on Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 19:33:10 -0400:
> What method of profiling do you re
I was able to capture a profile from svn (after remembering I have to link
statically). I compiled with "-pg -O0" Here is the top of the file:
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
% cumulative self self total
time seconds secondscalls s/call s/call name
88.88
On 10/2/2011 2:08 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
I was able to capture a profile from svn (after remembering I have to
link statically). I compiled with "-pg -O0" Here is the top of the file:
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
% cumulative self self total
time seconds secon
Kyle Leber wrote on Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 17:08:16 -0400:
> Is it OK to attach the full report to this user list? The resulting text
> file is 1.3MB and I wasn't sure if the list would tolerate an attachment of
> that size.
It would be better to upload it somewhere and send a link to this list,
or
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> I was able to capture a profile from svn (after remembering I have to link
> statically). I compiled with "-pg -O0" Here is the top of the file:
>
> Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
> % cumulative self self total
> ti
Johan,
I did a little more digging. There were a few different places where svn
seems to get hung up so I ran the gprof report on just the first one (the
merge takes hours otherwise). In this particular case, svn prints out that
it is merging from a small text file while it is hanging for more t
Kyle Leber wrote on Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 20:05:19 -0400:
> Johan,
>
> I did a little more digging. There were a few different places where svn
> seems to get hung up so I ran the gprof report on just the first one (the
> merge takes hours otherwise). In this particular case, svn prints out that
Yup, trunk version has empty properties
branch version has:
svn:mime-type
application/octet-stream
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Kyle Leber wrote on Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 20:05:19 -0400:
> > Johan,
> >
> > I did a little more digging. There were a few different place
[ Again: please don't top-post on this list. I'm moving your reply to
the bottom. More below ... ]
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>>
>> Kyle Leber wrote on Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 20:05:19 -0400:
>> > Johan,
>> >
>> > I did
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> [ Again: please don't top-post on this list. I'm moving your reply to
> the bottom. More below ... ]
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Kyle Leber w
Kyle Leber wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:16:53 -0400:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > (2) If the "base" of the merge target doesn't have a mime-type, look
> > if it has one on the "actual" node (the uncommitted local
> > modifications). If that's binary, then we'll
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> [ Again: please don't top-post on this list. I'm moving your reply to
>> the bottom. More below ... ]
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Kyle Leber wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 2, 2
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>
>>> [ Again: please don't top-post on this list. I'm moving your reply to
>>> the bottom. More below ... ]
>>>
>>> On Mon
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 14:59:25 +0200:
> It may also interest you (and other readers of this thread) that there
> is an open enhancement request for making text-merges take the same
> shortcut as binary-merges (if mine == merge-left then set merged :=
> merge-right), to avoid
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:59:25PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
> >> I set the mime-type to "application/octet-stream" in the working copy prior
> >> to merge and this fixed the problem
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 14:59:25 +0200:
>> It may also interest you (and other readers of this thread) that there
>> is an open enhancement request for making text-merges take the same
>> shortcut as binary-merges (if min
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:59:25PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Leber wrote:
>> >> I set the mime-type to "application/octet-stream" in th
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:59:25PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Johan Corveleyn
> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Leber
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
