On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:41:38 +
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Henrik Carlqvist h...@poolhem.se writes:
Would people hosting public svn repositories think that it would be
nice if some people using my tool would make one svn connection for
each revision in the
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:45:31 -0400
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
We came to the same conclusion when we built the revision graph in
Subclipse back in 1.5:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/graph.html
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:41:38 +
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Carlqvist [mailto:hc...@poolhem.se]
Sent: donderdag 27 maart 2014 07:47
To: Mark Phippard; philip.mar...@wandisco.com;
users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn2cvsgraph, how to best handle merges?
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:45:31 -0400
Mark
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:25:33 +0100
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
If you have any input on that thread, please let us know so we can just
create the api you need to get the information you need.
My tool does not call use subversion api, it simply uses popen to call the
svn command line
I have written a tool, svn2cvsgraph
( http://svn2cvsgraph.sourceforge.net/ )
to graphically display svn revision graphs.
Since version 1.6.17 of svn, svn log -g no longer shows any merges when
examining the repository root. After a discussion, here
Henrik Carlqvist h...@poolhem.se writes:
Would people hosting public svn repositories think that it would be nice
if some people using my tool would make one svn connection for each
revision in the repository?
It's a user problem as well since making a request per revision doesn't
scale well
We came to the same conclusion when we built the revision graph in
Subclipse back in 1.5:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/graph.html
Trying to do log on a whole branch with -g could even get quadratic loops
and take forever. Doing it one revision at a time was the only thing that
would work but
