Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-21 Thread Tony Sweeney
On 02/20/15 10:21, Philip Martin wrote: You are making things very hard for yourself by running 1.6.11, it is very old and no longer maintained, unless your distribution is backporting fixes. A newer version will have fewer bugs and better performance. You'll get no disagreement from me on tha

Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 8:21, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> On 20.02.2015 13:59, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Philip Martin >> wrote: >>> "Andreas Stieger" writes: >>> In addition to what Philip wrote, for initializing a sync to a target created via hotcopy

Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-20 Thread Branko Čibej
On 20.02.2015 13:59, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Philip Martin > wrote: >> "Andreas Stieger" writes: >> >>> In addition to what Philip wrote, for initializing a sync to a target >>> created via hotcopy, you will find "svnsync init --allow-non-empty" >>> very useful

Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-20 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > "Andreas Stieger" writes: > >> In addition to what Philip wrote, for initializing a sync to a target >> created via hotcopy, you will find "svnsync init --allow-non-empty" >> very useful. > > But only after upgrading as that is not present i

Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-20 Thread Philip Martin
"Andreas Stieger" writes: > In addition to what Philip wrote, for initializing a sync to a target > created via hotcopy, you will find "svnsync init --allow-non-empty" > very useful. But only after upgrading as that is not present in 1.6. -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *No

Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-20 Thread Andreas Stieger
> Tony Sweeney writes: > > running under Apache. I set the svn:sync-last-merged-rev revprop on > > r0 to reflect the newest revision on the hotcopy. In addition to what Philip wrote, for initializing a sync to a target created via hotcopy, you will find "svnsync init --allow-non-empty" very u

Re: svnsync problems

2015-02-20 Thread Philip Martin
You are making things very hard for yourself by running 1.6.11, it is very old and no longer maintained, unless your distribution is backporting fixes. A newer version will have fewer bugs and better performance. 1.6 has a hotcopy bug http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3596 t

svnsync problems

2015-02-19 Thread Tony Sweeney
Hi, Mise en scene: We have three Subversion servers, version 1.6.11 running on CentOS6. One is the live master and and the others are hot standbys in different datacenters. The intent is that these are kept in sync with the master using svnsync from a post-commit hook. One of the slaves is a