Kind regards,
Jon
[1] http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=man+flock%281%29
-Original Message-
From: Andersen, Krista [mailto:krista.ander...@itg.com]
Sent: 15 January 2010 22:29
To: Jon Foster; users@subversion.apache.org
Cc: ssi-svn_admin
Subject: RE: sync bug -> corrupted proxy repo
Tha
ct: 213.270.7570
-Original Message-
From: Jon Foster [mailto:jon.fos...@cabot.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:13 AM
To: Andersen, Krista; users@subversion.apache.org
Cc: ssi-svn_admin
Subject: RE: sync bug -> corrupted proxy repo
Hi,
Andersen, Krista [mailto:krista.ander...@itg
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jon Foster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> But Subversion blocks the commit until the post-commit is done.
>
> That particular SVN client will be blocked. But if you have
> two users committing at the same time, or if a user runs "svn"
> twice in parallel
Hi,
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> But Subversion blocks the commit until the post-commit is done.
That particular SVN client will be blocked. But if you have
two users committing at the same time, or if a user runs "svn"
twice in parallel, then the post-commit hook will be run in
parallel.
Here's how I
On Jan 14, 2010, at 09:06, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Is it not the case that a svn commit cannot start before the post-commit
>> hooks has finished? I am asking becuase I will be implementing a DR system
>> using svnsync, but I am not planning to let the post-commit finish before
>> svnsync has
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Giulio Troccoli
wrote:
>> From: Jon Foster [mailto:jon.fos...@cabot.co.uk]
>> Sent: 13 January 2010 13:13
>> To: Andersen, Krista; users@subversion.apache.org
>> Cc: ssi-svn_admin
>> Subject: RE: sync bug -> corrupted proxy repo
To: Andersen, Krista; users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: ssi-svn_admin
> Subject: RE: sync bug -> corrupted proxy repo
>
> Hi,
>
> Andersen, Krista [mailto:krista.ander...@itg.com] wrote:
> > Twice I have seen one of my proxy repositories become
> corrupted due to
>
Hi,
Andersen, Krista [mailto:krista.ander...@itg.com] wrote:
> Twice I have seen one of my proxy repositories become corrupted due
> to an apparent bug in the svnsync sync process. Has anyone else
> seen this type of behavior from Subversion?
This is probably caused by issue 3546 [1][2]. This i
Twice I have seen one of my proxy repositories become corrupted due to an
apparent bug in the svnsync sync process. Has anyone else seen this type of
behavior from Subversion?
I am able to move the corrupted proxy-repo and recreate it again without error
- but I am a bit concerned about the st
