Hmm. It looks a little bit like tapestry, when I look at example 3 in the
wiki. Maybe like tapestry 4.1 + tacos and bits of trails.
Cheers,
PS
On 6/23/06, hv @ Fashion Content [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone checked out ZK (http://zk1.sourceforge.net/) and compared it
with
Tapestry ?
Hi All,
I'm doing a simple form that has a checkbox which must be checked in
order to submit the form:
form jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] clientValidationEnabled=ognl:true
TC:input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:readTC
validators=validators:required/
input jwcid=@Submit
What happens if you take the listener off the button and put it on the form
itself.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:23 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Checkbox required validation not working
Hi All,
I'm doing a simple
No difference, I changed the form to:
form jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] clientValidationEnabled=ognl:true
listener=listener:confirm
TC:input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:readTC
validators=validators:required/
input jwcid=@Submit type=submit name=Submit value=Confirm/
/form
On
Hi Adam,
The required validator generates client-side javascript that calls the
Tapestry.require_field function. This is the code of that function:
Tapestry.require_field = function(event, fieldId, message)
{
var field = this.find(fieldId);
if (field.value.length == 0)
no what ?
On 6/24/06, Maura Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no
- Original Message -
From: Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Checkbox required validation not working
Looks good Scott! I
eZing Builder tapestry toolbar may be released in the end of this month.
http://ezingbuilder.sourceforge.net/images/tapestrytoolbar.jpg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WYSIWYG-tapestry--eclipse-editor-t1841431.html#a5026849
Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at
Hi,
I have an old Tapestry app which I began to slowly port to Tapestry 4. How
do I get a hold of the old visit object configured Tapestry-3 style in a
Tapestry 4 page?
I tried
MyVisit visit = (MyVisit) getApplicationStateManager().get(visit);
but this doesn't work
Thanks in advance,
-Yves-
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:50:48 -0400, Yves Sy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an old Tapestry app which I began to slowly port to Tapestry 4.
How
do I get a hold of the old visit object configured Tapestry-3 style in a
Tapestry 4 page?
The easiest thing to do is access it the same way you
lol best reply ever
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:55:55 +0300, Maura Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
no
- Original Message - From: Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Checkbox required validation
Thanks for the reply.
Since I prefer to use non-deprecated methods, I'm trying to do it the latter
way:
@InjectState(visit)
public abstract MyVisit getMyVisit();
..but this ends up with a runtime error
Unable to add field _$applicationStateManager to class
$ProflightOptionsLink_106: duplicate
property name=org.apache.tapestry.visit-class
value=org.xxx.MyVisit/
Instead of above, please try :
meta key=org.apache.tapestry.visit-class
value=org.xxx.MyVisit/
Shing
--- Yves Sy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Since I prefer to use non-deprecated methods, I'm
I have a DAO layer that attempts to hide the implementation details
from its caller (per dao definition). This is managed by Spring and
objects are pulled out in my tap pages using the tapestry-spring lib.
This works well at face value. The issue is the infamous lazy-loading
of detached objects
We have a very large financial services applicaiton built with Tapestry 3
and it meets all the requirements for the project. But in looking ahead, I
am trying to get some data to guide technology decisions for the project.
My questions are:
- Hibernate is used extensively in 4.x and though the
Re: Hibernate. It's used all over the place by many applications. It isn't
really associated with IOC containers or even web applications in generally
as it's simply (ha!) a database abstraction/mapping framework. Whether you
use Tapestry or not, Hibernate is excellent at what it does. With
I'm guessing you mean Hivemind, not Hibernate.
Hibernate is an ORM that is completely independant of Tapestry. Some users
(like myself) use it and thus seek out (or develop) solutions that integrate
the two (eg. tapernate, honeycomb, cognition). You might see talk about that
on the mail;ing
That being said, Scott, it *is* much easier to plug in to Tapestry using
HiveMind, since Tapestry itself is wired together using HiveMind.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:41 PM
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Tue enough, although I must say I had no problems plugging Spring in using the
Spring integration jar. Very quick and painless.
I think that use of Hivemind is required when one needs to extend or enhance
or add new functionality to Tapestry itself. Certainly one could also use
Hivemind as a
I would agree that it's a bit much more difficult to grok, but we're
working on that what HiveMind 2.0! Yes, you don't need to know anything
about HiveMind, necessarily, to use Tapestry. But, if you want to
extend/enhance it (as you said), you do.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Russell
I would beg to differ. Hivemind is not optional in many cases, the
following are items that I think are not unusual things to do in
Tapestry and all require knowledge of Hivemind.
Override or provide new services:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/UsersGuide/upgrade.html#upgrade.service
(This
Its working fine now. My code was correct -- but i somehow forgot i declared
the following in a superclass which caused the runtime error...
public abstract ApplicationStateManager getApplicationStateManager();
Thanks for the help!
-Yves-
On 6/25/06, Shing Hing Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
21 matches
Mail list logo
