Re: new dojo table widget

2006-08-20 Thread Pedro Viegas
Saw the demo! Great stuff!!! The feature list is very interesting indeed! Can't wait to get this Tapestry integrated :-D On 8/18/06, Vinicius Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really cool! I was waiting for this kind of component :) Thanks! On 8/17/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: tapdoc

2006-08-20 Thread Norbert Sándor
I think it's not... If I remember well then when the components of a library are enumerated, only those components are listed which have an explicit component-type / declaration in the .library file. Pure Java components are not, so they won't be included in the documentation by default. Pure

Re: tapdoc

2006-08-20 Thread Norbert Sándor
OK, I would. andyhot wrote: thx Norbert! Just saw that we're not currently generating javadocs for contib (why???) at http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/tapestry-contrib/apidocs/index.html but I guess you could already include this link in TapDocTask.java (for the external javadoc

its working, but a problem

2006-08-20 Thread zqzuk
Hi, thanks for your hints, and its working, generally, but i m stuck with a problem which i doubt if its a bug? suppose my form produces rows such like this, data are retrieved from databases --- name attended

RE: its working, but a problem

2006-08-20 Thread Detlef Schulze
sigh Like always: please post some code, it is quite hard to guess what you did wrong when it is not visible WHAT you did exactly cheers, detlef -Original Message- From: zqzuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sonntag, 20. August 2006 17:15 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: its

Re: its working, but a problem

2006-08-20 Thread Karthik N
Hmm. rather bizzare. Can you try setting volatile=true on the For component and see how it goes? http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/For.html On 8/20/06, zqzuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, thanks for your hints, and its working, generally, but i m stuck with a

it works!

2006-08-20 Thread zqzuk
hi, thanks so much! it works! could you please explain why is this? i read the link, it says Determines whether to avoid creating hidden fields within a form. Using this parameter may make the form structure different during render and rewind, and cause exceptions as a result. Please use with

RE: its working, but a problem

2006-08-20 Thread zqzuk
sry! will do that. thnx anyway Detlef Schulze wrote: sigh Like always: please post some code, it is quite hard to guess what you did wrong when it is not visible WHAT you did exactly cheers, detlef -Original Message- From: zqzuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sonntag,

Re: it works!

2006-08-20 Thread Karthik N
i don't have an exact explanation till i view your source code. i'm glad it works, so maybe you can do some more research to see why the volatile makes the difference for the ticked/unticked issue of yours. your understanding of volatile is incorrect. in fact, with volatile=false the For

Link to external application

2006-08-20 Thread Josh Joy
Hi All, I have a newbie question...in my tapestry application based on user input I am generating links to external websites, for instance the user will input their address and I would to return back to them thru html a href tags a link to the mapquest page with the map information.

Re: Link to external application

2006-08-20 Thread Shing Hing Man
Have you looked at the GenericLink or Any component ? http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/GenericLink.html http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/Any.html Shing --- Josh Joy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have a newbie

Re: Link to external application

2006-08-20 Thread Josh Joy
Thanks, the Any tag works well for this situation. Shing Hing Man wrote: Have you looked at the GenericLink or Any component ? http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/GenericLink.html http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/Any.html Shing

How to handle components and filesystem wysiwyg design?

2006-08-20 Thread Malin Ljungh
I thought one of the main advantages of Tapestry was that you can open your html files directly from the filesystem and see how they actually will look when rendered by the Tapestry servlet. But now when my design guy is about to do the css this is not the case, and I guess it is because I have

Re: Tapestry 4.1 EventListener example

2006-08-20 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
you shuold be using the latest 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT build if you are going to attempt this. (though it might work in the original 4.1, I can't vouch for it anymore..too many changes since then) On 8/20/06, Shing Hing Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tried out a snippet of code on EventListener at

Re: Tapestry 4.1 EventListener example

2006-08-20 Thread Shing Hing Man
I am already using the latest 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT. In my pom.xml : dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.1-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency dependency

Re: Tapestry 4.1 EventListener example

2006-08-20 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Try changing which events you listen for...Specifically, don't use captial case. I think that only works when used on a node directly. Ie: events = onmouseover On 8/20/06, Shing Hing Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am already using the latest 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT. In my pom.xml : dependency

Re: How to handle components and filesystem wysiwyg design?

2006-08-20 Thread hv @ Fashion Content
This is why I don't use the Border component pattern, but add the basic structure to all pages. With a decent css design and some NavigationPane/Header/Footer components you can keep the additional tags quite low, and allow the designer maximum freedom. Something like: html jwcid=shell head