it took me some time to realize you're using Tapestry 4
please add the version number next time.
there are basically two simple ways to influence the session expiration:
1) change the timeout in your web.xml
10
2) create a component, that is placed on every
Is below error caused by session expired
http://utilitybase.com/paste/29788
if yes, how to extend the tapestry user session? or better way to resolve this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For ad
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 -0300, Pierce T. Wetter III
wrote:
Menus are inherently recursive.
To avoid problems with Tapestry and recursion, I figured out I could
setup things this way, if the currentMenu has a list of its ancestors:
For anything recursive, the best way of implementing
Menus are inherently recursive.
In order to generate ours, I need to generate a series of UL and LI tags with
class="current" on the menu for the current page, and class="currentAncestor"
for the ancestors of the current page.
Example:
Top
Level
Try decorating instead of overriding. Could require less copying?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:53 PM, paha wrote:
>
> well, the solution is almost perfect now. "almost" - because i have to
> completely duplicate the code of PropertyAccessImpl replacing 2 calls to
> Introspector.getBeanInfo buried i
If I have a page that includes a passed parameter and that page has a form,
when a validation error occurs the redirect link no longer contains the
parameter in the query string of the original URL.
For example:
This URL brings up a form:
http://example.com/Item?itemno=1251092
If the user click
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:45:53 -0300, Raul Raja Martinez
wrote:
Yes if the body of a Layout component is considered a child component
of the Layoutand all events triggered from components that are
children would pass through Layout as well when bubbling up.
Right.
If that was the case firin
2010/4/22 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo :
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:13 -0300, Raul Raja Martinez
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Thiago, Makes sense,
>>
>> What would be the right pattern If I have something like...
>>
>> PageA
>> - Layout
>> - Button
>
> Wouldn't it be
>
> PageA
> - Layout
> - - Butto
To work around in various odd situations, a component can handle its
event and then issue another event that will percolate up to the
parent components. Plus it can be given a better name and even pass
extra parameters.
Norman Franke
Answering Service for Directors, Inc.
www.myasd.com
On
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:20:13 -0300, Raul Raja Martinez
wrote:
Thanks Thiago, Makes sense,
What would be the right pattern If I have something like...
PageA
- Layout
- Button
Wouldn't it be
PageA
- Layout
- - Button
?
Image both Button and OtherButton are components and that Layout
Thanks Thiago, Makes sense,
What would be the right pattern If I have something like...
PageA
- Layout
- Button
PageB
- Layout
- OtherButton
Image both Button and OtherButton are components and that Layout has a
Growl notification system.
I want the growl notification showing up a message w
I've fixed the issue yesterday. Unfortunately hudson took too long to
trigger the build and upload the resent snapshots. The build was completed
successfully today at 5:30 pm. Try the recent snapshots and report if the
issue still exists.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Brian Heston wrote:
> Th
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:40:26 -0300, Raul Raja Martinez
wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
Is it possible to handle events inside components that have been
triggered by other events?
Events are triggered by components, not by events themselves.
If a page does not handle an event wouldn't that event be bub
Hi,
We have several pages that contain a Layout component wrapping the
context of a page.
Also those pages have components that trigger events. We would like to
handle some of the events in the Layout component.
The docs state that for Event Bubbling "The event will bubble up the
hierarchy, until
The change requested in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1077 breaks
existing functionality for Spring to load properties. I've added comments and
supporting files to the issue, but I didn't see a way to reopen it so I wanted
to make sure people knew. If you've updated tapestry-sprin
hi
We have started to write a contribution to let Spring configure hibernate,
tx... and let Tapestry services be in the same transaction when calling data
layer, it's hosted at http://github.com/spreadthesource/tapestry5-spring-tx
See the test application to see how it works.
It still not docume
Hi,
i'm looking for a way to integrate Hibernate Shards into my T5 app.
A switch to JPA is not an option, we have to much hibernate specific stuff
(queries, mappings, etc).
So i think the shortest path would be to override the "tapestry-core
SessionFactory providing classes" in some way.
At th
That's not currently supported.
I'm expecting to extend the concept of the "global" message catalog to
be a compendium of multiple resources, including
WEB-INF/app.properties but also contributions from libraries. It may
replace the current ValidationMessages mechanism.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:
well, the solution is almost perfect now. "almost" - because i have to
completely duplicate the code of PropertyAccessImpl replacing 2 calls to
Introspector.getBeanInfo buried inside private methods :)
here is a service override and final class
public static void contributeServiceOverride(Mapped
Inge Solvoll-2 wrote:
>
> Sounds like you did a ServiceOverride without actually realizing it
> yourself
> :)
> well i was pretty sure i'm reinventing some wheels :) . of course i wanted
> to do a service override as soon as i realized that PropertyAccess is
> introduced via ioc
Inge Solvoll
Hi,
I want to develop a service with it's own Message Catalog, without depending on
a Page's or the "Global" App message catalog.
How can I achieve that?
Thanks!
- Everton
That did the trick! What a great feature :)
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:57:26 -0300, Jeanne Rash
> wrote:
>
>> The /src/main/resources where indeed excluded from copy to the classes
>> folder. Thanks for that tip.
>
> :)
>
>>
Sounds like you did a ServiceOverride without actually realizing it yourself
:)
And you have an excellent solution to your problem. Here is a link that
explains how to not do it using a very very ugly hack :)
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.1/tapestry-ioc/cookbook/override.html
On Thu, Apr
Solved the problem with one very very nasty hack, but if somebody interested:
i commented the ioc binding for PropertyAccess implementation in
org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.services.TapestryIOCModule
// binder.bind(PropertyAccess.class, PropertyAccessImpl.class);
then i introduced an own implementat
?? What do you mean?
On 22/04/2010, at 5:59 AM, Yury Luneff wrote:
>> Tapestry follows the definition of JavaBeans properties, set by Sun,
>
> isn't "isSmth" and "setSmth" a standard for boolean properties? well,
> tapestry seeks "setSmth" disregarding the type.
>
> Maybe, it is an old holywar
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> Tapestry uses the standard Introspector object to identify
> properties.
>
Can you give me a hint, how i can change this? It is a PropertyAccessImpl
class, that is doing the magic, isn't? Is it possible to replace this class
via config? Or is it the only way - t
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> Tapestry follows the definition of JavaBeans properties, set by Sun
>
Well, Spring3 BeanUtils.getPropertyDescriptors(User.class) returns all
property descriptions with setters even if they are not void.
Now i have to either give up using setter chaining which is ve
27 matches
Mail list logo
